2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2003.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma post oxidation of nitrocarburized hot work steel samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frictional behaviour is different for all the three tool steel materials, TS 1 and TS 2 show unsteady and higher friction values in the range of 0.9 to 1 whereas TS 3 shows steadier and lower friction values ranging from 0.7 to 0.8. The higher and more unsteady friction in case of TS 1 and TS 2 is caused by the presence of a different surface layer composition as seen from XRD analysis and it is known that the composition of the oxide layer is affected by the substrate [ 6 ]. TS 3, postoxidized at 500 °C (PO1), shows a lower friction coefficient in the beginning and at the end of the test compared to TS 1 and TS 2 with PO1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frictional behaviour is different for all the three tool steel materials, TS 1 and TS 2 show unsteady and higher friction values in the range of 0.9 to 1 whereas TS 3 shows steadier and lower friction values ranging from 0.7 to 0.8. The higher and more unsteady friction in case of TS 1 and TS 2 is caused by the presence of a different surface layer composition as seen from XRD analysis and it is known that the composition of the oxide layer is affected by the substrate [ 6 ]. TS 3, postoxidized at 500 °C (PO1), shows a lower friction coefficient in the beginning and at the end of the test compared to TS 1 and TS 2 with PO1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun concluded that at higher post-oxidizing temperatures, a more porous and less adherent oxide film is formed, which leads to poor tribological behaviour. Zlatanović et al [ 6 ] investigated oxide films, created on salt bath nitrocarburized and plasma nitrocarburized steel samples, respectively. They found that a well adherent Fe 3 O 4 layer was formed on the nitrided samples whereas a Fe 2 O 3 layer was formed on an untreated reference sample, indicating that the substrate plays an important role in determining the final oxide composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4a,b highlights the EBSD results for phase analysis of the microstructure for the surface hardened layer in the air and steam-specimens. In Figure 4a,b, the red, green, and yellow colors represent magnetite(Fe 3 O 4 ) with a face-centered cubic (FCC) structure, ε-phase(Fe 2-3 N) with a hexagonal close-packed (HCP) structure, and γ -phase(Fe 4 N) with FCC structure, respectively [14,15]. For the air-specimen, an oxide layer with a thickness of 2 µm covered the porous ε-phase, similar to the results shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Microstructure and Phase Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter can be achieved through the formation of an inner compound layer consisting of ε-Fe 2−3 N, γ -Fe 4 N and other nitrides [2]; the former through an outer layer which should essentially contain magnetite, a very low content of hematite and probably FeO as well. The hematite phase layer is porous, brittle and a little adherent [3] while the magnetite one denser and more homogeneous so with a higher corrosion performance and a lower friction coefficient [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%