2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Microbiomes: Do Different Preservation Approaches and Primer Sets Alter Our Capacity to Assess Microbial Diversity and Community Composition?

Abstract: data interpretation and primer differences do not impact the treatment effect, which has significant implication for future large-scale and global surveys of plant microbiomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(89 reference statements)
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extracted DNA was quality checked by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and PCR checked to confirm the amplifiability. Amplicon sequencing was performed using 799F/1193R targeting 16S rRNA for bacteria and ITS2 region FITS7‐ITS4R (Hamonts et al, 2018; H. Liu et al, 2019; Qiu et al, 2020) at the Next‐Generation Sequencing Facility, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW Australia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracted DNA was quality checked by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and PCR checked to confirm the amplifiability. Amplicon sequencing was performed using 799F/1193R targeting 16S rRNA for bacteria and ITS2 region FITS7‐ITS4R (Hamonts et al, 2018; H. Liu et al, 2019; Qiu et al, 2020) at the Next‐Generation Sequencing Facility, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW Australia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For characterizing the bacterial communities, primers 341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and 805R (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) were used to amplify the V3 and V4 region of 16S rDNA gene ( Herlemann et al, 2011 ; Qiu et al, 2020 ). 25 μL PCR reactions were performed with 40 ng μL –1 template DNA, 12.5 μL Multiplex Master Mix (Qiagen, Mexico), 1.25 μL each primer, 6 μL MilliQ water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four DNA extraction kits tested in this study were chosen on the basis of previous studies that had yielded good sequencing results. Two of the kits were designed especially for soil samples (Kits 2 and 4) and had been previously used for extracting DNA from decomposing leaf litter (Kit 2; Tláskal et al, 2016) or in other studies that compared extraction procedures to minimize the introduction of bias (Kit 2, Qiu et al, 2020; Kit 4, Sare et al, 2020). Kit 3 was used to extract DNA from macrophyte leaf litter decomposition (Zhao et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we compare four commercial kits originally designed for water or soil. With the exception of the DNeasy PowerWater Kit, which is mainly used for DNA extraction from large water samples, the kits have been used in other studies focusing on plant microbiomes (Tláskal et al, 2016; Zhao et al, 2017; Qiu et al, 2020; Sare et al, 2020). The goal of our study is to identify the most suitable kit for the extraction of DNA from bacteria associated with biofilms on decaying water lily leaves for 16S rRNA amplicon analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%