Global diversity curves reflect more than just the number of taxa that have existed through time: they also mirror variation in the nature of the fossil record and the way the record is reported. These sampling effects are best quantified by assembling and analyzing large numbers of locality-specific biotic inventories. Here, we introduce a new database of this kind for the Phanerozoic fossil record of marine invertebrates. We apply four substantially distinct analytical methods that estimate taxonomic diversity by quantifying and correcting for variation through time in the number and nature of inventories. Variation introduced by the use of two dramatically different counting protocols also is explored. We present sampling-standardized diversity estimates for two long intervals that sum to 300 Myr (Middle Ordovician-Carboniferous; Late Jurassic-Paleogene). Our new curves differ considerably from traditional, synoptic curves. For example, some of them imply unexpectedly low late Cretaceous and early Tertiary diversity levels. However, such factors as the current emphasis in the database on North America and Europe still obscure our view of the global history of marine biodiversity. These limitations will be addressed as the database and methods are refined.
Homoplastic evolution of 'unique' morphological characteristics in the Schismatoglottideae -many previously used to define genera -prompted this study to compare morphology and function in connection with pollination biology for Aridarum nicolsonii, Phymatarum borneense and Schottarum sarikeense. Aridarum nicolsonii and P. borneense extrude pollen through a pair of horned thecae while S. sarikeense sheds pollen through a pair of pores on the thecae. Floral traits of spathe constriction, presence and movement of sterile structures on the spadix, the comparable role of horned thecae and thecae pores, the presence of stamen-associated calcium oxalate packages, and the timing of odour emission are discussed in the context of their roles in pollinator management. Pollinators for all investigated species were determined to be species of Colocasiomyia (Diptera: Drosophilidae).
Recent studies on Schismatoglottideae have resulted in the recognition of four new monophyletic genera, the resurrection of two additional genera following clarification of their monophyly, and the publication of many taxonomically novel species. However, generic boundaries among some parts of Schismatoglottideae remain unclear owing to several reasons: (1) more taxa are being revealed through our on-going fieldwork, now expanded to previously unsampled localities on Borneo; (2) established occurrence of a high level of homoplasies among the morphological characteristics hitherto used to delimitate genera; and (3) gene regions used in previous studies contradicted some of current taxonomic placements. Among the unsolved groups from previous studies a clade comprising Schismatoglottis sarikeensis and S. josefii needs further investigation. Therefore, phylogenetic analyses were carried out to investigate the position of these two species using the nuclear region, internal transcribed spacer and combined plastid regions: trnL intron and trnL-F intergenic spacer, coding matK?partial 3 0 trnK, intergenic spacer trnH-psbA. A total of 23 accessions representing 16 taxa of Schismatoglottideae and Philonotieae were included in the study. Phylogenetic analyses of a total 4,658 bp combined dataset using parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian methods revealed that S. sarikeensis and S. josefii do not belong to Schismatoglottis, and therefore are transferred to Schottarum (:Hottarum sarikeense : Schismatoglottis sarikeense). Flowering mechanism, pollination strategy, and fruitset of S. sarikeense are also presented in the paper.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.