2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning the coordination of overcurrent relays for distribution systems considering network reconfiguration and load restoration

Abstract: The power distribution system is evolving in the form of smart grid. The proliferation of distributed energy resources (DERs) is making the previously passive system active and more complicated. With the adoption of de-carbonization principles, large-scale coal and nuclear power plants are being gradually replaced by renewables and carbon-free DERs. With this rapid transformation, power system is operating with less inertia and minimal margins. In recent years, power system is facing apocalyptic weather events… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that in the presented results, the GCPVS is protected against the overcurrent through an instantaneous relay installed at its terminal. This relay is set to disconnect the GCPVS with a 50 ms delay after observing I DG ≥ 125% in any phase [28].…”
Section: Short-circuit Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that in the presented results, the GCPVS is protected against the overcurrent through an instantaneous relay installed at its terminal. This relay is set to disconnect the GCPVS with a 50 ms delay after observing I DG ≥ 125% in any phase [28].…”
Section: Short-circuit Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, online protection coordination can be realized by adaptive protection setting, 26,37,38 group setting, 39‐41 telecommunication between protection devices, 26,42 and using multi‐agent‐based 13,28,43‐45 coordination methods. In some online methods, 46‐50 the optimal setting of protection devices can be determined for each change in the topology of the network or DG output. However, this may increase the complexity and implementation cost of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quantity is typically chosen to be between 0.2 and 0.5 s in the literature and is set to 0.3 s in this paper. Encouraging proposals to accomplish overcurrent coordination have been published in the literature such as adaptive protection [3,4,[17][18][19][20][21][22], fault current limiter installation to mitigate the impact of distributed generation [1, [23][24][25][26][27], restriction of distributed generation in faulty conditions [28], fault ride-through control of the inverter [2,[29][30][31], optimal distributed generator (DG) location and sizing [1,32], planning schemes [24,25], clustering [33] and communication-based dual setting methods [15,16,34]. Some demerits of each scheme are outlined in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%