2001
DOI: 10.1177/15234220122238463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planned Training on the Job: A Typology

Abstract: The problem and the solution. What are the different types of planned training on the job? And how do they match with types of intended learning processes? This chapter proposes four models of planned training on the job. Each model is connected to one type of learning process and one corresponding set of roles for trainee and trainer. Types of training objectives and training procedures are discussed per model. Finally, the chapter discusses the implications of the typology for human resource development (HRD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This in turn leads to difficulty in judging the value of coaching for HR (Robson, 2011). De Jong, Thijssen, and Versloot (2001), for example, conceived coaching as "a selfevaluation" process of planned training on the job with other elements of it being job instruction, apprenticeship, and inquiry. Although "self-evaluation" sounds narrow, De Jong et al (2001) conceptualized it as continuation of inquiry, involving continuous goal setting, feedback setting, and reflecting on past experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in turn leads to difficulty in judging the value of coaching for HR (Robson, 2011). De Jong, Thijssen, and Versloot (2001), for example, conceived coaching as "a selfevaluation" process of planned training on the job with other elements of it being job instruction, apprenticeship, and inquiry. Although "self-evaluation" sounds narrow, De Jong et al (2001) conceptualized it as continuation of inquiry, involving continuous goal setting, feedback setting, and reflecting on past experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that the very central question of what coaching actually is remains an area of continuing debate (Bachkirova & Kauffman, 2009;Baron & Morin, 2012;Grant et al, 2010;Hamlin, Ellinger, & Beattie, 2009;Peterson & Little, 2005). Some HRD professionals, for example, argue that there is no distinction between the main aims of organization deveopment (OD) and HRM professionals and coaches (Hamlin et al, 2009), whereas others see coaching as only a small element of planned training on the job (De Jong, Thijssen, & Versloot, 2001). Some authors see coaching as an important part of the strategic function of HRD (Ulrich, 2007); others have explored to what degree and in what ways coaching impacts those who have been coached after receiving facilitated feedback in comparison to those who received only facilitated multisource feedback (Nieminen, Smerek, Kotrba, & Denison, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%