Two schools of thought exist about the purpose and process of coaching. One school of thought holds the strong belief or assumption that the purpose of coaching is to change behaviour through a goal-directed approach. The counterview has the underlying assumption that coaching is a meaning-making process, a shared journey that may or may not result in behavior change. These two approaches have different ontologies (definitions of the nature of reality) and epistemologies (explanations of how we come to know what we know). They are underpinned by worldviews rooted largely in either modernism (goal-resolution focus) or postmodernism (meaning-making). These schools of thought are explained in this paper, after which the paper examines a study that examined the lived experience of coached executives. It concludes that goal-resolution and meaning-making can co-exist. It appears from the study of coached executives who were interviewed through a constructivist grounded theory study that what is actually occurring in coaching is that meaning-making precedes goal-resolution. The implications of this for coaching education are that coaching education could address the ontology and epistemology of knowledge and methodology. This may increase an understanding of the coaches' own worldviews and consequently they would be more mindful of the impact and potential bias of the methodological choices they are making in their coaching practice. : coaching, goal-resolution, meaning-making, postmodernism, modernism, worldviews This paper begins by sharing the need for theory development with the field of coaching. It contextualizes how the role of reflexivity, with particular reference to reflecting on our worldviews, is needed in research and in our coaching practice. Two articles are reviewed, which reflect different schools of thought about the purpose and definition of the coaching process. One school of thought shares the strong belief or assumption that the purpose of coaching is to change behaviour (Grant, 2012), while the other school of thought has the underlying assumption that coaching is a meaning-making process, a shared journey that may or may not result in behavior change (Stelter, 2016). These two approaches have different ontologies (definitions of the nature of reality) and epistemologies (explanations of how we come to know what we know).
Keywords