2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2008.00595.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PIT tag retention and tag induced mortality in juvenile bonytail and Gila chub

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, PIT‐tagging had minimal impact on swimming performance, similar to what has been reported for bullhead (Knaepkens et al., 2007) and juvenile rainbow trout (Newby et al., 2007). Finally, tag retention was comparable to that found in other experimental studies (Acolas et al., 2007; Ward et al., 2008; Bolland et al., 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Likewise, PIT‐tagging had minimal impact on swimming performance, similar to what has been reported for bullhead (Knaepkens et al., 2007) and juvenile rainbow trout (Newby et al., 2007). Finally, tag retention was comparable to that found in other experimental studies (Acolas et al., 2007; Ward et al., 2008; Bolland et al., 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Overall, 80 fish, 66–124 mm fork length, were stocked into aerated aquaria (50 × 30 × 25 cm), with gravel bottoms and filtered water. The length range used was that typically encountered in the wild and which appeared acceptable for PIT‐tagging based on results in other small fish (Acolas et al., 2007; Ward et al., 2008). Fish were acclimated to experimental conditions for 7 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on our two-year study, retention of PIT tags in eastern hellbenders is high and consistent with other herpetofauna and aquatic vertebrates (table 1). There are several factors that can increase PIT tag retention including: proper needle placement and orientation, tag implantation location, adequate immobilization of the individual, handler experience, and physiology of taxa (Gibbons and Andrews, 2004;Ward, Childs and Persons, 2008). In this study, proper implantation of tags deep into the tail musculature most likely minimized loss of PIT tags.…”
Section: Molecular Approachmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…>98%) and low tag loss (i.e. 3%), 30 days post abdominal tagging (Childs, 2002;Ward et al, 2008), indicating there is likely minimal tag loss and negligible effects on HBC survival due to tagging. Because PIT tags are inserted into the abdominal cavity, tags are not discernable to visual predators, likely making a tagged fish no more susceptible to predation by such species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%