2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for skipped spawning in a potamodromous cyprinid, humpback chub (Gila cypha), with implications for demographic parameter estimates

Abstract: a b s t r a c tOur findings reveal evidence for skipped spawning in a potamodromous cyprinid, humpback chub (HBC; Gila cypha). Using closed robust design mark-recapture models, we found, on average, spawning HBC transition to the skipped spawning state ( ¯ ) with a probability of 0.45 (95% CRI (i.e. credible interval): 0.10, 0.80) and skipped spawners remain in the skipped spawning state ( ¯ ) with a probability of 0.60 (95% CRI: 0.26, 0.83), yielding an average spawning cycle of every 2.12 years, conditional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PIAs in Shinumo and Bright Angel creeks spanned the width of their respective stream channels, and were installed as close to the mouth as possible (~200 m), but differed in the number of arrays; Shinumo Creek consisted of two antenna arrays installed 200 m upstream of the waterfall, while three were installed in Bright Angel Creek for additional redundancy to improve detection rates. PIA operations were uninterrupted with some exceptions; due to power supply issues and flood damage, the LCR PIA has operated intermittently since 2009 (Pearson et al, 2015) with more continuous operation between August 2017 and August 2019, and the Shinumo Creek PIA power failed briefly during winter of 2010. The Shinumo PIA was destroyed during the flood of July 2014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PIAs in Shinumo and Bright Angel creeks spanned the width of their respective stream channels, and were installed as close to the mouth as possible (~200 m), but differed in the number of arrays; Shinumo Creek consisted of two antenna arrays installed 200 m upstream of the waterfall, while three were installed in Bright Angel Creek for additional redundancy to improve detection rates. PIA operations were uninterrupted with some exceptions; due to power supply issues and flood damage, the LCR PIA has operated intermittently since 2009 (Pearson et al, 2015) with more continuous operation between August 2017 and August 2019, and the Shinumo Creek PIA power failed briefly during winter of 2010. The Shinumo PIA was destroyed during the flood of July 2014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This directional shift in the suckers could be explained by stochastic variation, annual variability in growth rates, annual behavioral differences (such as skipped spawning, as has been observed for another Colorado River large‐bodied fish: Pearson et al. ), or recent decreased recruitment of smaller mature fish. With only 3 years of data to compare (two for Flannelmouth Sucker), it is impossible determine the true cause of the size shift, but the most concerning possibility is that of decreased recruitment of mature suckers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…], fish [Pearson et al. ]). Because sea turtles, whose foraging grounds are usually distant from their nesting beaches, use this conditional strategy, we expected the Jumby Bay nesting population to exhibit relatively constant survival and variable remigration (conditional breeding) probabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-lived, iteroparous species tend to have high survival rates once they reach maturity, due, in part, to their ability to vary their reproductive effort in response to environmental conditions (e.g., food availability, distance to breeding area). These adjustments can take the form of foregoing breeding in some years (Bull and Shine 1979), especially for migratory species (e.g., seabirds [Converse et al 2009], pinnipeds [Hadley et al 2007], cetaceans [Fujiwara and Caswell 2002], amphibians [Church et al 2007], fish [Pearson et al 2015]). Because sea turtles, whose foraging grounds are usually distant from their nesting beaches, use this conditional strategy, we expected the Jumby Bay nesting population to exhibit relatively constant survival and variable remigration (conditional breeding) probabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%