2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot study of the vertical variations in outdoor pollutant concentrations and environmental conditions along the height of a tall building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average concentrations of PM 10 , PM 2.5 , and PM 1.0 were 35.6 μg/m 3 , 21.3 μg/m 3 , 16.2 μg/m 3 , respectively. Some related literature showed the concentration distribution of outdoor particulate matters in high-rise buildings had a great relationship with the outdoor wind field [26,27], and there were obvious vortices at different heights. Table 2 showed the relevant values of outdoor meteorological parameters during the test.…”
Section: Variation Of Average Concentration Of Particulates With Diffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average concentrations of PM 10 , PM 2.5 , and PM 1.0 were 35.6 μg/m 3 , 21.3 μg/m 3 , 16.2 μg/m 3 , respectively. Some related literature showed the concentration distribution of outdoor particulate matters in high-rise buildings had a great relationship with the outdoor wind field [26,27], and there were obvious vortices at different heights. Table 2 showed the relevant values of outdoor meteorological parameters during the test.…”
Section: Variation Of Average Concentration Of Particulates With Diffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few previous studies conducted measurements on roadside high-rise buildings to investigate the vertical concentration profiles of traffic-related air pollutants. Major pollutants such as PM 10 , PM 2.5 (particulate matter with a diameter less than 10 μm and 2.5 μm, respectively) NO 2 , CO 2 , and CO emitted from the adjacent roads were gradually reduced as the measurement height increased because of vertical mixing [ 18 , 19 ]. To overcome the spatial limitations of vertical distribution measurements based on fixed structures such as towers and buildings, mobile measurements using a drone have recently been attempted by many researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of PM 2.5 was decreased significantly on the top floor throughout the whole year, which is coincident with results determined by previous studies. 33,57,59 On the 12th floor (62.6 m), the averaged PM 2.5 concentration was decreased by 8.4% (3.7%-12.3%), 23.4% (20.5%-34.3%), 17.1% (15.7%-20.9%) and 16.7% (12.2%-23.4%) over four measured periods. In contrast, Liu et al 33 investigated the vertical profile of PM 2.5 based on a 100 m height office building in an urban area and a mountain in the forest park in Nanjing over four seasons.…”
Section: Numerical Prediction Of Indoor Pm25 Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Over the past decade, vertical particle profiles on highrise office building facades have been focused on by researchers. 33,[54][55][56][57][58][59] Generally, the outdoor airborne particle concentration would decrease with the rise in height. Furthermore, several studies indicate that the outdoor particle concentration shows a stronger apparent decreasing trend with the height in open areas than in urban areas.…”
Section: Numerical Prediction Of Indoor Pm25 Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%