2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aoas.2015.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical and functional properties of quinoa protein isolate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
112
3
17

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
13
112
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding indicated that ultrasound pretreatment at 400 W could improve the accessibility of QPI to the enzyme. This finding is similar with previous study (Elsohaimy, Refaay, & Zaytoun, 2015). The improvement in DH might be related to the unfolding of protein induced by ultrasound treatment, which was discussed in Section 3.5.…”
Section: Effect Of Ultrasound Pretreatment On Degree Of Hydrolysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding indicated that ultrasound pretreatment at 400 W could improve the accessibility of QPI to the enzyme. This finding is similar with previous study (Elsohaimy, Refaay, & Zaytoun, 2015). The improvement in DH might be related to the unfolding of protein induced by ultrasound treatment, which was discussed in Section 3.5.…”
Section: Effect Of Ultrasound Pretreatment On Degree Of Hydrolysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…La baja pérdida de peso en el tratamiento observada en las salchichas se explica por la capacidad de retención de agua atribuida a la proteína miofibrilar presente en la carne [30,31,32] y a la adición de los extensores cárnicos, en este caso las harinas de quinua y de trigo [11,33,34].…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…The low solubility at pH 4 is due to the fact that this pH is close to the pH of the isoelectric point (pI) of the 11S quinoa globulin (around 5) since there are no repulsive charges, which leads to protein association and precipitation (Kaspchak et al, ). In contrast, the solubility of QPI, QPI‐HD, and QPI‐FL at pH 10 was significantly higher ( p < .05) compared to the values found at pH 4 and 7, possibly due to higher pH at the isoelectric point favoring a change in the structure of the protein that produces a greater exposure of the hydrophilic proteins, increasing the surface polarity and its interaction with water (Elsohaimy et al, ; Kaspchak et al, ; Mäkinen et al, ). Furthermore, it has been reported that at pH values higher than isoelectric point value, there are negative charges on the protein, causing more interaction with the solvent and increase of solubility (Ruiz, Xiao, Van Boekel, Minor, & Stieger, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%