2010
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/248/1/012059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical limits for scaling of integrated circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To enable this, packaging substrate is essential to fan out the compact circuitries between the 3D IC module and the main board, so that thermal expansion mismatch can be minimized, and a less dense main board is required (lower cost) (Lau, 2015). Moreover, scaling of silicon devices is reaching its physical limit (Nawrocki, 2010). Interconnect technology is also growing at a rapid pace (Figure 3).…”
Section: The Flexible Electronics Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable this, packaging substrate is essential to fan out the compact circuitries between the 3D IC module and the main board, so that thermal expansion mismatch can be minimized, and a less dense main board is required (lower cost) (Lau, 2015). Moreover, scaling of silicon devices is reaching its physical limit (Nawrocki, 2010). Interconnect technology is also growing at a rapid pace (Figure 3).…”
Section: The Flexible Electronics Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Current conventional evaporation and deposition methods involving inorganic silicon-based electronics do not allow progression beyond the microscale owing to the natural physical limitations. 2 In this context, biomolecules such as nucleic acids and proteins are of interest due to their unique functional and complementary properties such as molecular recognition, self-assembly and folding, and the ability to mediate electric charges. 3,4 These nanoscale polymers offer high potential for structural manipulation that could be utilized in nanoconstructions for various applications.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the world advancing toward miniaturization, the exciting prospect of fabrication of nanodevices may only be practically possible through molecular electronics . Current conventional evaporation and deposition methods involving inorganic silicon-based electronics do not allow progression beyond the microscale owing to the natural physical limitations . In this context, biomolecules such as nucleic acids and proteins are of interest due to their unique functional and complementary properties such as molecular recognition, self-assembly and folding, and the ability to mediate electric charges. , These nanoscale polymers offer high potential for structural manipulation that could be utilized in nanoconstructions for various applications. , The key advantage of the molecular approach is the ability to design and fabricate devices using a cost-effective and environmentally friendly “bottom-up” approach …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With each size decrease, new scaling issues occurred primarily because of deposition technology limitations of that era. However, as we move closer to single nanometer nodes, fundamental limitations that originate from material properties start to take over as the main challenges that were previously reserved for instrumentation [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%