2016
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v36n1p143-151/2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical attributes of a pasture soil in southeast Goiás determined by geostatistics

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the spatial dependence of physical attributes in a soil cultivated with Brachiaria grass. A 12-m regular sampling grid was established within an area of 3.500 m 2 . Thirty-five soil samples were collected at 0-30 cm depth for particle density, bulk density, texture and total porosity analysis. These data were evaluated using statistical methods of indicator kriging and the GS+ software. The GS+ software was used to develop three-dimensional maps and evaluate semivariograms. The spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different soil attributes have been used to characterize the physical changes caused by compaction due to animal trampling or even due to different pastureland management practices. The physical parameters that are commonly used to characterize soil under pasture include bulk density, porosity (Cardoso, Wanderley, & Souza, 2016;Carvalho, Ruiz, Costa, Passos, & Araújo, 2014), soil penetration resistance (Cubillos et al, 2016;Redin et al, 2017), and soil-water infiltration (Cullotta et al, 2016;Suárez, Navarro, Campos, Flores, & Mejía, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different soil attributes have been used to characterize the physical changes caused by compaction due to animal trampling or even due to different pastureland management practices. The physical parameters that are commonly used to characterize soil under pasture include bulk density, porosity (Cardoso, Wanderley, & Souza, 2016;Carvalho, Ruiz, Costa, Passos, & Araújo, 2014), soil penetration resistance (Cubillos et al, 2016;Redin et al, 2017), and soil-water infiltration (Cullotta et al, 2016;Suárez, Navarro, Campos, Flores, & Mejía, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distances were used as the x-axis and the Moran's I coefficients as the y-axis (Figure 3), thus reflecting the variation of the spatial autocorrelation degree with distance. In the other eight measurements except for 27 May, Moran's I coefficients were significant with p > 5% and Z-values greater than |1.96| [38,39]. However, the Moran's I coefficient on 27 May was insignificant.…”
Section: Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis Of Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although studies and field experiences are fundamental for the knowledge and mapping of soil attributes and classification (Buol et al, 2011), the line of research using pedrometry is gaining focus in soil studies due to the operational agility, low cost and reliable results (Cardoso et al, 2016;Ceddia et al, 2014;Hengl et al, 2015;McBratney et al, 2003). The quantitative techniques of spatial prediction are generally derived from geostatistics or from pedo-transference functions (Carvalho et al;, McBratney et al, 2003Webster, 1994) and these were used in the mapping of attributes and soil classification in studies executed by Carvalho et al (2002), Minasny & Hartemink (2011), Moore et al (1993), Souza et al (2010) and Souza et al (2015).…”
Section: Introduction and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%