2014
DOI: 10.1206/834.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny, Taxonomic Revision, and Character Evolution of the GeneraChiasmocleisandSyncope(Anura, Microhylidae) in Amazonia, with Descriptions of Three New Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominances were represented by a Dominance Component curve or Whittaker Diagram, obtained by ranking species, starting with the most abundant, along the x-axis and the logarithm abundances on the y-axis. Rare species were those represented by a single individual (singletons), and the same number of species in the upper end of the abundance (Peloso et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dominances were represented by a Dominance Component curve or Whittaker Diagram, obtained by ranking species, starting with the most abundant, along the x-axis and the logarithm abundances on the y-axis. Rare species were those represented by a single individual (singletons), and the same number of species in the upper end of the abundance (Peloso et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microhylid Chiasmocleis royi, historically mistaken for Chiasmocleis ventrimaculata, was recently described for the state of Acre (Peloso et al 2014). The previously known distribution for C. royi encompasses the eastern and southern regions of Peru, northern Bolivia and western Brazil in the The record of Pristimantis lacrimosus and Pristimantis skydmainos in the area studied is relatively important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed in 25.0 μL volumes with 2.0 μL of genomic DNA. For the 16S fragment (~ 566 bp) we used the universal primers 16Sar (5′-CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT-3′) and 16Sbr (5′-CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCACGT-3′) (Palumbi 1996), whereas for the COI fragment (~ 658 bp) we used the primers COI.PF-A (5-TTTCAACHAAYCAYAAAGAYATYGG-3') and COI.PR-A (5'-TANACTTCNGGGTGDCCAAARAATCA-3') (Peloso et al 2014). PCR and DNA sequencing protocols followed those in Peloso et al (2014;2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 16S fragment (~ 566 bp) we used the universal primers 16Sar (5′-CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT-3′) and 16Sbr (5′-CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCACGT-3′) (Palumbi 1996), whereas for the COI fragment (~ 658 bp) we used the primers COI.PF-A (5-TTTCAACHAAYCAYAAAGAYATYGG-3') and COI.PR-A (5'-TANACTTCNGGGTGDCCAAARAATCA-3') (Peloso et al 2014). PCR and DNA sequencing protocols followed those in Peloso et al (2014;2016). Resulting sequences were manually edited using the original chromatograms in Sequencher 4.1.4 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) or Geneious 9.1.8 (Kearse et al 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%