2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of the subfamily Stelliferinae suggests speciation in Ophioscion Gill, 1863 (Sciaenidae: Perciformes) in the western South Atlantic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCRs were run in a final volume of 15 μl, containing 2.4 μl of dNTPs (1.25 mM), 1.5 μl of 10 X buffer solution, 0.5 μl of MgCl 2 (50 mM), 0.3 μl of each primer (10 pmol/μl), 1–3 μl of genomic DNA (100 ng/μl), 0.12 μl of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl), and water to complete the final reaction volume. The cycling conditions were based on the protocol described by Silva et al [ 10 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PCRs were run in a final volume of 15 μl, containing 2.4 μl of dNTPs (1.25 mM), 1.5 μl of 10 X buffer solution, 0.5 μl of MgCl 2 (50 mM), 0.3 μl of each primer (10 pmol/μl), 1–3 μl of genomic DNA (100 ng/μl), 0.12 μl of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl), and water to complete the final reaction volume. The cycling conditions were based on the protocol described by Silva et al [ 10 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic analyses based on multilocus data have shown that Stellifer and Ophioscion are not monophyletic, as suggested previously, and thus require a detailed taxonomic review [ 7 , 9 , 10 ]. More recently, Chao et al [ 8 ] recognized Ophioscion as a junior synonym of Stellifer based on morphological analysis, which means that Stelliferinae is currently made up of only five genera ( Stellifer , Bairdiella , Odontoscion , Corvula , and Elattarchus ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phylogeny of the Sciaenidae has been studied using morphological features (mostly relying on otolith and swim bladder morphology), but these have major limitations, that have been discussed at length before (Sasaki 1989), as well as several different single gene-based molecular markers (Lakra et al 2009, Cheng et al 2012. However, due to high species richness and wide distribution of (predominantly) marine species, resolution provided by small molecular markers is likely to be too low for this problem, so taxonomy and phylogeny of this family remain only partially resolved (Barbosa et al 2014, Xu et al 2014, Lo et al 2015, Silva et al 2018. This indicates that a molecular marker with a higher resolution may be needed to resolve the evolutionary history of this speciose family.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, considering that speciation processes might take place without major changes in morphology, the actual number of species might be underestimated when external body features are analysed in isolation (Winker, 2005). Failure of species diagnosis has a particularly negative impact on economically important species in fisheries where distinct morphotypes putatively related to a single species might encompass multiple evolutionary units (Mayden, 1997; Winker, 2005; Da Silva et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%