2013
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.038497-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phyllobacterium endophyticum sp. nov., isolated from nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris

Abstract: A strain, PEPV15 T , was isolated from a nodule on Phaseolus vulgaris grown in soil in northern Spain. Phylogenetic analyses of 16S rRNA and atpD genes showed that this strain belongs to the genus Phyllobacterium. The most closely related species were, in both cases, Phyllobacterium brassicacearum, Phyllobacterium bourgognense and Phyllobacterium trifolii, the type strains of which gave sequence similarities of 98.9, 98.6 and 98.4 %, respectively, in the 16S rRNA gene and 88.1, 87.5 and 88.7 %, respectively, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total DNA extracted from CCBAU 03422 T according to the method of Chun & Goodfellow (1995) was used for analysis of DNA base composition by the thermal denaturation method (Mandel & Marmur, 1968). The genomic DNA G+C content was 54.1 mol% ( T m ), which is within the range reported for species of the genus Phyllobacterium (Flores-Félix et al , 2013; Mantelin et al , 2006).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Total DNA extracted from CCBAU 03422 T according to the method of Chun & Goodfellow (1995) was used for analysis of DNA base composition by the thermal denaturation method (Mandel & Marmur, 1968). The genomic DNA G+C content was 54.1 mol% ( T m ), which is within the range reported for species of the genus Phyllobacterium (Flores-Félix et al , 2013; Mantelin et al , 2006).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…To date, the genus Phyllobacterium contains nine species including the recently described Phyllobacterium loti (Sánchez et al , 2014; ). Of these species, five were isolated from root nodules of legumes, including Phyllobacterium trifolii from Trifolium and Lupinus (Valverde et al , 2005), Phyllobacterium leguminum from Argyrolobium uniflorum and Astragalus algerianus (Mantelin et al , 2006), Phyllobacterium loti from Lotus corniculatus (Sánchez et al , 2014), Phyllobacterium endophyticum from Phaseolus vulgaris (Flores-Félix et al , 2013) and Phyllobacterium ifriqiyense from Astragalus algerianus and Lathyrus numidicus (Mantelin et al , 2006). The other four species were Phyllobacterium catacumbae isolated from Roman catacombs (Jurado et al , 2005), Phyllobacterium brassicacearum and Phyllobacterium bourgognense isolated from rhizoplane of Brassica napus (Mantelin et al , 2006), and Phyllobacterium myrsinacearum (subjective synonym of Phyllobacterium rubiacearum ) isolated form leaf nodules of Ardisia (Mergaert et al , 2002; ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phyllobacterium strains have been identified in different environments (31), mostly as plant-associated bacteria (28,30,47,48). To date, the Phyllobacterium genus contains 10 species, but only two, P. trifolii and P. sophorae, are able to induce effective nodules on their host legumes, Trifolium pratense and Sophora flavescens, respectively (26,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed nitrogen (NH 4 + ) is provided to plants by bacteroides. It is hypothesized that, in return, the plants deliver organic acids and several carbon and energy sources to the bacteroides as root exudates [24][25][26]. The overall procedure is completely based on saprophytic survival and adherence during chickpea cropping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%