2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.717-720.395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoluminescence Study of the Driving Force for Stacking Fault Expansion in 4H-SiC

Abstract: We investigated expansion velocities of Shockley stacking faults (SSFs) in 4H-silicon carbide under laser illumination using photoluminescence methods. The experiments showed that the velocity of SSF expansion or the glide velocity of SSF-bounding 30°-Si(g) partial dislocations (PD) is supralinearly dependent on the excitation intensity. We estimated sample temperature by analyzing the broadening of band-edge emission and concluded that the lattice heating by laser illumination is not the cause of the enhanced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this value and the lateral moving speed of the electron probe (<¼ 3 Â 10 À3 m/s), the magnitude of Dx for a line scan at the largest is estimated to be approximately 0.1 lm, which is sufficiently smaller than R. Therefore, it is confirmed that Dx was not given by R. The obtained PD velocity, 5 Â 10 À5 m/s, corresponds to the velocity in the case of irradiation at 1.2 Â 10 6 W/cm 2 , from the results shown in the literature. 19 The irradiation current was not measured in our experiments, but the estimated current from this power is approximately 4 lA, which is roughly plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using this value and the lateral moving speed of the electron probe (<¼ 3 Â 10 À3 m/s), the magnitude of Dx for a line scan at the largest is estimated to be approximately 0.1 lm, which is sufficiently smaller than R. Therefore, it is confirmed that Dx was not given by R. The obtained PD velocity, 5 Â 10 À5 m/s, corresponds to the velocity in the case of irradiation at 1.2 Â 10 6 W/cm 2 , from the results shown in the literature. 19 The irradiation current was not measured in our experiments, but the estimated current from this power is approximately 4 lA, which is roughly plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on SSF expansion or PD motion often employed imaging methods using electroluminescence, 11 photoluminescence, 14,18,19 cathodoluminescence, 20 or electronbeam-induced current. 20,21 In this paper, we report the observation of SSFs using secondary electron images, which is the most common mode of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample heating by the laser illumination ( 42 mW) was determined to be negligible based on the fitting of the free-exciton emission spectra to the theoretical Maxwell-Boltzmann shape. 10) The stacking-fault-related emission at 2.9 eV was selected using band-pass filters and its intensity mapping on the sample surface was obtained. First, the stacking fault was expanded to $2 mm in length from the indent by scanning the excitation laser in advance.…”
Section: Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the above results clearly show that LEEBI enhances the dislocation mobility, however, nature of driving force is not so clear. When indentation is used as a source for dislocation nucleation, force acting on the leading partial dislocation, which drives the SSF expansion, in a common case consists of shear stress from indentation and the "quantum well action," which in turn can depend on an excitation level [21] and on the SSF size. A shear stress decreases with r approximately as r À2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be a shear stress applied to the crystal or/and the "quantum well action." At rather high excitation level by the laser beam a superlinear dependence of dislocation velocity on the laser intensity was observed, [21] which was explained by the excess carrier effect on the SSF effective formation energy, i.e. on the effective driving force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%