2007
DOI: 10.1086/518530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonetic Symbolism and Brand Name Preference

Abstract: Two experiments investigated the effects of phonetic symbolism on brand name preference. Participants indicated preference for fictitious brand names for particular products (or for products with particular attributes) from word pairs that differed only on vowel sound (e.g., front vs. back vowels, or vowel sounds associated with positive vs. negative concepts). Participants preferred brand names more when the attributes connoted by the vowel sounds (e.g., small, sharp) were positive for a product category (e.g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
195
3
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
16
195
3
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of them are based on experiments (Leclerc et al, 1994;Lowrey & Shrum, 2007;Maheswaran, 1994), so we use this methodology in order to verify our hypotheses.…”
Section: Methods 41 Experiments Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of them are based on experiments (Leclerc et al, 1994;Lowrey & Shrum, 2007;Maheswaran, 1994), so we use this methodology in order to verify our hypotheses.…”
Section: Methods 41 Experiments Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, as in other newly developed countries, there is a large generational gap whereby new generations have different values and buying patterns, so studies aiming to analyse the relations among consumers' behaviour and international brands should consider these differences and focus their sample in specific generations in order to obtain homogeneous and unbiased answers. Moreover, the use of students in the sample for this type of experiment is well known and accepted in the marketing literature (Kocher, Czellar, & Usunier, 2006;Lowrey & Shrum, 2007;Maheswaran, 1994;Pan & Lehmann, 1993).…”
Section: Methods 41 Experiments Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior empirical studies have shown that pronunciation in terms of phonetic structure (Yorkston & Menon, 2004), the 'hardness' of consonants (Heath, Chatterjee, & France, 1990), and different vowel sounds (Lowrey & Shrum, 2007) effect consumer impressions of a brand name. In their study, LeClerc et al (1994) stated that French pronunciation of a brand name effects hedonic perceptions of products.…”
Section: Foreign Brandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing what kind of processes and factors could affect brand names evaluation, marketers and social psychologists have been focused, particularly, on five factors as follows: personalizing the brand (Wansink, Painter, & van Ittersum, 2001), fluency of words/brand names (Alter & Daniel Oppenheimer, 2006); name-letter effect (Brendl, Chattopadhyay, Pelham, & Carvallo, 2005;Nuttin, 1985); alpha-numeric brand names (Gunasti and Ross, 2010) and sound symbolism (Wu, Klink & Guo, 2013;Lowrey & Shrum, 2007;Yorkston & Menon, 2004;Klink, 2001). We will review below the studies regarding this topics.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Perception Of Brand Names: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound Symbolism -the nonarbitrary relation between a sound of a word and its meaning -has been widely recognized as an important factor in how individuals infer specific meaning from unfamiliar brand names (Wu, Klink & Guo, 2013;Lowrey & Shrum, 2007;Klink, 2001). A brand name is composed of sounds called phonemes.…”
Section: Sound Symbolismmentioning
confidence: 99%