1998
DOI: 10.1093/jee/91.2.500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pheromone-Baited Traps for Dendroctonus Pseudotsugae(Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Influence of Selected Release Rates and Trap Designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, bark beetle responses to certain attractive semiochemicals decline at very high release rates (Seybold et al 1992;Ross and Daterman 1998;Miller et al 2005). Semiochemicals possessing such a parabolic dose-response curve should possess a single, optimally-attractive release rate; therefore the attractive activity of a bait exceeding this optimum dose could conceivably be enhanced by displacing it from the target (e.g., a trap), thereby effectively reducing its dose both at and downwind of the target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, bark beetle responses to certain attractive semiochemicals decline at very high release rates (Seybold et al 1992;Ross and Daterman 1998;Miller et al 2005). Semiochemicals possessing such a parabolic dose-response curve should possess a single, optimally-attractive release rate; therefore the attractive activity of a bait exceeding this optimum dose could conceivably be enhanced by displacing it from the target (e.g., a trap), thereby effectively reducing its dose both at and downwind of the target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may have negative effects on bark beetle population dynamics. Minimizing the capture of predators is then required and some simple modifications of trap design have already been tested (Ross and Daterman, 1998). For example, differences in size between these species could allow using a screen filter of appropriate size within the collection cup, retaining Monochamus beetles and leaving predators to escape through the open drainage hole in the bottom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical exclusion methods using screens or escape pipes in the traps have had mixed success and in some cases reduce removal of the target pest (Bakke 1989, Ross andDaterman 1998). The applicability of physical exclusion depends largely on the speciÞc natural enemy guild of the targeted pest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%