2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic plasticity in response to light in the coffee tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
82
1
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
11
82
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported in other shade tolerant species (Matos et al, 2009). Results of higher A at 1000 µmol m -2 s -1 of PPFD were also related to higher J, which provides the amounts of ATP and NADPH available for use in the Calvin cycle.…”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescencesupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were reported in other shade tolerant species (Matos et al, 2009). Results of higher A at 1000 µmol m -2 s -1 of PPFD were also related to higher J, which provides the amounts of ATP and NADPH available for use in the Calvin cycle.…”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescencesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Intermediate values of NPQ at high PPFD suggest that high levels of photoprotection mechanisms associated with increased xanthophyll's cycle were not required. Studies in coffee leaves exposed to high PPFD showed higher NPQ compared with values obtained in this study, indicating a high protective use of the xanthophyll's cycle (Matos et al, 2009). …”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 43%
“…The higher level of carotenoids is related to photoprotection mechanisms against excessive irradiance intercepted by the leaves of the most exposed branches of coffee plants (MATOS et al, 2009). Furthermore, the lower chlorophyll a/carotenoid ratio (3.04; deduced from Table 1) in the most exposed branches of IAC 62 compared to more internal branches (3.52) suggests greater photo protection capacity of leaves of these branches (MATOS et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results corroborate the findings of Chaves et al (2012), who found great variability in RAFFr of plagiotropic branches across different positions in the coffee canopy. The probable difference in the availability of light between positions 1 and 2 may have influenced this feature, given the known effect of light on the morphological plasticity of the coffee crop (MATOS et al, 2009;RODRÍGUEZ-LÓPES et al, 2014), mainly on the floral profusion (CANNELL, 1985;FAHL et al, 2009). Vaast et al (2006) observed reduction in RAFRr from 18 cm 2 fruit -1 in the shaded environment to 13 cm 2 fruit -1 in coffee plants in full sunlight in two consecutive harvests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation