2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-019-2656-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic plasticity in bighorn sheep reproductive phenology: from individual to population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A lack of substantial difference between females in their response to temperature is interesting, particularly given the range of environmental conditions experienced by individuals in this population over multiple decades. Similarly, a recent study of common terns ( Sterna hirundo ) found little support for individual variation in plasticity of lay date in response to temperatures experienced during the nonbreeding period, despite large sample sizes (Dobson et al., ), and a study of big horn sheep found no variation in plasticity of parturition date in response to autumn temperature or precipitation (Renaud et al., ). These results imply no potential either for genotype–environment interactions (GxE), nor for selection on individual plasticity—both of which would be required for plasticity itself to evolve (Gienapp & Brommer, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A lack of substantial difference between females in their response to temperature is interesting, particularly given the range of environmental conditions experienced by individuals in this population over multiple decades. Similarly, a recent study of common terns ( Sterna hirundo ) found little support for individual variation in plasticity of lay date in response to temperatures experienced during the nonbreeding period, despite large sample sizes (Dobson et al., ), and a study of big horn sheep found no variation in plasticity of parturition date in response to autumn temperature or precipitation (Renaud et al., ). These results imply no potential either for genotype–environment interactions (GxE), nor for selection on individual plasticity—both of which would be required for plasticity itself to evolve (Gienapp & Brommer, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for example in a Canadian population of tree swallows ( Tachycineta bicolor ), within‐individual plasticity in breeding time in response to spring temperatures is equivalent to the population‐level change (Bourret, Bélisle, Pelletier, & Garant, ), and in barn swallows ( Hirundo rustica ) breeding in Denmark, within‐individual plasticity is sufficient to explain overall associations between body condition and vegetation measures (NDVI) in one part of the migration route (Balbontin et al., ). A recent study of bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis ) in Alberta, Canada, found that within‐individual plasticity in response to autumn precipitation explained the population‐level association with parturition date (Renaud, Pigeon, Festa‐Bianchet, & Pelletier, ). Other studies have separated within‐ from between‐individual level changes in response to climate, but without explicitly testing whether within‐individual plasticity was sufficient to explain the population‐level responses to changing climate (Dehnhard et al., ; Dobson, Becker, Arnaud, Bouwhuis, & Charmantier, ; Hinke, Polito, Reiss, Trivelpiece, & Trivelpiece, ; Lane, Kruuk, Charmantier, Murie, & Dobson, ; Lane et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the in situ mechanisms for adaptation to climate change, plastic responses may be at least as important as evolutionary responses for many species (Hoffmann and Sgro, 2011), although these two mechanisms can be difficult to distinguish (Merilä and Hendry, 2014). Experimental or observational studies of plasticity could provide useful information for prioritizing vulnerable desert bighorn populations (e.g., Renaud et al, 2019).…”
Section: Refining Estimates Of Population Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%