2020
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and Environmental Indicators of Climate Change Vulnerability for Desert Bighorn Sheep

Abstract: Desert Bighorn Climate Change Vulnerability populations occupying relatively intact landscapes, such as Death Valley and Grand Canyon national parks, had the lowest overall vulnerability. These results provide local and regional context for conservation and management decisions regarding bighorn populations in a changing climate. Our study further demonstrates how assessments combining multiple factors could allow a more integrated response, such as increasing efforts to maintain connectivity and thus potentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a suite of 16 microsatellite markers in three panels ( Table S2 ) that had previously been used to investigate population connectivity and genetic variability in bighorn sheep ( Creech et al, 2020 ; Creech et al, 2020 ; Epps, Crowhurst & Nickerson, 2018 ). Genotyping followed protocols outlined in Epps, Crowhurst & Nickerson (2018) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used a suite of 16 microsatellite markers in three panels ( Table S2 ) that had previously been used to investigate population connectivity and genetic variability in bighorn sheep ( Creech et al, 2020 ; Creech et al, 2020 ; Epps, Crowhurst & Nickerson, 2018 ). Genotyping followed protocols outlined in Epps, Crowhurst & Nickerson (2018) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, three subspecies of bighorn sheep are recognized, the desert bighorn sheep (O. c. nelsoni), the Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (O. c. canadensis), and the Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep (O. c. sierrae) (Wehausen & Ramey II, 2000;Wehausen, Bleich & Ramey II, 2005). Previously, other subspecies were recognized (e.g., Peninsular bighorn sheep, O. c. cremnobates, and California bighorn sheep, O. c. californiana) (Cowan, 1940). Debate remains about whether those putative lineages reflect important independent evolutionary trajectories and important local adaptation (Buchalski et al, 2016;Bleich, Sargeant & Wiedmann, 2018;Barbosa et al, in press).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the discriminant analysis (DA) summarizes between-group genetic differentiation, while minimizing the within-group variation [ 56 , 73 ], we computed a PCA analysis that highlighted the within-group variation [ 56 ]. The PCA ( Figure 3 a) revealed a strong differentiation of the North African–APP sheep group from the Venetian sheep group, demonstrated both a high within-group genetic variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a suite of 16 microsatellite markers in three panels (Table S2) that had previously been used to investigate population connectivity and genetic variability in bighorn sheep (Creech et al, 2017(Creech et al, , 2020Epps, Crowhurst & Nickerson, 2018). Genotyping followed protocols outlined in Epps, Crowhurst & Nickerson (2018).…”
Section: Genotyping Markers Individual Identification and Markermentioning
confidence: 99%