Phenotypic Alterations and Crop Maturity Differences in Ultra‐Narrow Row and Conventionally Spaced Cotton

Abstract

Ultra‐narrow row cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production is considered a potential strategy for reducing production costs by shortening the growing season. A 2‐yr field study was conducted near College Station, TX, on varying soil types to document phenotypic alterations and crop maturity differences for cotton grown in 19‐, 38‐, 76‐, and 101‐cm row spacings. In the 19‐cm rows, the plant densities were 12.2, 18.8, and 40.5 plants m−2 Densities of 11.3 and 19.5 plants m−2 were established in the 38‐cm rows. In the 76‐ and 101‐cm rows, plant densities of 11.7 and 7.4 plants m−2, respectively, were evaluated. Plant height and node counts were reduced in the narrow (19 and 38 cm) row spacings in only 1 yr. The narrow row spacings at the higher plant densities consistently accumulated leaf area index more rapidly than the conventional (76 and 101 cm) row spacings. In 1998, when the study was conducted on a heavy clay soil, the higher plant densities in the 19‐ and 38‐cm row spacings tended to partition more biomass to reproductive structures and yielded more than the conventional row spacings. In 1999, the test was conducted on a lighter silty clay loam soil and yields were unaffected by the row‐spacing treatments. In 1998, the higher plant densities in the 19‐ and 38‐cm row spacings had a greater percentage of harvestable bolls at the first fruiting positions on lower nodes, a boll distribution pattern that contributed to earlier crop maturity. Narrow row spacings and high plant densities did not consistently alter fiber quality. No conclusive differences for crop growth and development could be ascertained between the medium and high plant densities in the 19‐ and 38‐cm row spacings. However, ultra‐narrow row cotton may be more advantageous to producers when grown on heavier soils that typically do not promote excessive vegetative growth.

Épocas de semeadura, cultivares e densidades de plantas para algodão adensado em segunda safra

“…Em 2010 e 2011, não houve aumento de produtividade com as variações da população de plantas, assim como observado por Jost & Cothren (2001), Clawson et al (2006) e Silva et al (2011.…”

“…Espaçamentos estreitos podem reduzir o ciclo do algodoeiro e o número de aplicações de defensivos para o controle de pragas e doenças (Jost & Cothren 2001). Porém, em maiores populações de plantas, o ambiente pode se tornar propício à incidência de doenças fúngicas.…”

“…Em espaçamentos entre fileiras inferiores a 0,51 m e com altas populações, Clawson et al (2006) observaram que o número de capulhos por planta reduziu, mas a produtividade não foi alterada em virtude do maior número de plantas por área. Jost & Cothren (2001) observaram que populações de 122.000-450.000 plantas ha -1 não afetaram a produtividade e a qualidade da fibra. Porém, a maturidade e a colheita do algodão foram antecipadas nas maiores populações.…”

Growth performance of castor bean hybrids under different plant densities

“…One strategy that would make the best use of the rains in the first months of cultivation is to adjust plant density. The use of narrow and ultranarrow spacing altogether with the increase of the number of plants is a common practice in cotton crops and, allows its cultivation as a second crop due to the anticipation of the harvest provided by the reduction in boll number per plant (Jost & Cothren, 2000;Jost & Cothren, 2001;Gwathmey & Clement, 2010). In the castor bean crop, the number of racemes and the number of fruits/seeds per raceme Souza-Schlick et al, 2011) are also reduced.…”

Desenvolvimento de plantas de algodão provenientes de sementes embebidas em cloreto de mepiquat

“…Esse cultivo é economicamente lucrativo, uma vez que tem potencial para reduzir custos de produção, devido ao encurtamento do ciclo produtivo (Jost & Cothren, 2001), com conseqüente diminuição do número de aplicações de defensivos agrícolas para o controle de pragas e doenças.…”