2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenolic composition, physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of interspecific hybrids of grapes growing in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
33
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, the total phenolic contents of both grape pulp and grape seed varied from 9.26 to 62.29 mg GAE/100 g and from 162.29 to 326.18 mg GAE/100 g respectively (Yılmaz et al, 2015). In the experiments reported by Samoticha et al (2017), the total phenolic content of white grapes varied from 1974.9 to 3 884.4 mg/100 g, while it ranged from 1 037.0 to 5 759.1 mg/100 g in red grapes. The degree of maturity and environmental conditions influence the amount of phenolic compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study, the total phenolic contents of both grape pulp and grape seed varied from 9.26 to 62.29 mg GAE/100 g and from 162.29 to 326.18 mg GAE/100 g respectively (Yılmaz et al, 2015). In the experiments reported by Samoticha et al (2017), the total phenolic content of white grapes varied from 1974.9 to 3 884.4 mg/100 g, while it ranged from 1 037.0 to 5 759.1 mg/100 g in red grapes. The degree of maturity and environmental conditions influence the amount of phenolic compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…According to the total dry matter assay, the highest value was found in Yapıncak seeds (68.27%), while the lowest amount of dry matter was in seeds of Yalova incisi (56.38%). According to Samoticha et al (2017), the soluble solid contents range from 10.6°Brix to 22.3°Brix in white grapes, and from 15.2°Brix to 20.6°Brix for red grapes. The average total acidity of the white and red cultivars was 0.95 and 0.93 g tartaric acid/100 g, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic acid content was measured by HPLC‐PDA and sugar content was measured by HPLC‐ELSD as described previously by Samoticha et al. (2017). Results are expressed in g/L.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tartaric, l ‐malic, and citric acids are the most notable primary organic acids present in grapes and are also responsible for the largest proportion of titratable acidity in the wines (Chidi, Rossouw, Buica, & Bauer, 2015; Shiraishi, Fujishima, & Chijiwa, 2010). One of the main causes of the excessive acidity of wine is the high level of l ‐malic acid, whose level in grapes growing in a cold climate varies from 15 to 16 g/L, depending on the region and climate season and variety (Kunicka‐Styczyńska & Pogorzelski, ; Samoticha, Wojdyło, & Golis, 2017). Additionally, organic acids play a significant role in the perception of wine quality, affecting the balance in wine between acidity and sweetness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many analytical methods with various detection techniques are reported for the separation and identification of individual stilbenes in edible berries, such as liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (Vrhovsek et al 2012), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) (Može et al 2011), liquid chromatography with dual detection by a photodiode array and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-PDA-QTOF/MS) (Samoticha et al 2017), high-pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) (Bavaresco et al 2002;Jiang et al 2012;Kiselev et al 2017), high-pressure liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) (Bavaresco et al 2002;Sun et al 2006;Vilanova et al 2015;Guerrero et al 2010aGuerrero et al , 2016, high-pressure liquid chromatography with UV detection (HPLC-UV) (Vincenzi et al 2013;Kawakami et al 2014;He et al 2009a), ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC/QTOF/MS) (Flamini et al 2016;De Rosso et al 2016), ultra-performance liquid chromatography with dual detection by a photodiode array and fluorescence detectors (UPLC/DAD/FL) (Samoticha et al 2017), ultra-performance liquid chromatography with dual detection by a diode array and tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC/ DAD/TQD) (Guerrero et al 2010a), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Ragab et al 2006;Viñas et al 2009Viñas et al , 2011, gas chromatographymass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring (GC-MS SIM) (Rimando and Cody 2005), gas-liquid chromatography with flame ionization detection (GLC-FID) (Moriartry et al 2001), capillary electrophoresis (CE) (Ehala et al 2005) and high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCC) (He et al 2009b). Various methods are used for analyses of stilbenes contents in the edible berries are different which could also contribute to the observed variability in the published results.…”
Section: Isolation and Identification Of Stilbenes In Edible Berriesmentioning
confidence: 99%