2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PhenoApt leverages clinical expertise to prioritize candidate genes via machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined system, which we called PhenoGenius provided the best performance and reached a nearly full match (99.8%, 1682/1686) for all clinical descriptions. We compared PhenoGenius to four recently published algorithms for phenotype-driven gene prioritization: PhenoApt, Phen2Gene, CADA, and LIRICAL (7,(14)(15)(16). Despite using different prioritization methodologies, these four programs demonstrated similar performances in phenotype matching (Figure 5C).…”
Section: Conditional Algorithm Of Symptom Interaction Modeling For Ph...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combined system, which we called PhenoGenius provided the best performance and reached a nearly full match (99.8%, 1682/1686) for all clinical descriptions. We compared PhenoGenius to four recently published algorithms for phenotype-driven gene prioritization: PhenoApt, Phen2Gene, CADA, and LIRICAL (7,(14)(15)(16). Despite using different prioritization methodologies, these four programs demonstrated similar performances in phenotype matching (Figure 5C).…”
Section: Conditional Algorithm Of Symptom Interaction Modeling For Ph...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work has been partially supported by MIAI@Grenoble Alpes (ANR-19-P3IA-0003). 6 , Nicolas Chatron 7 , Cedric Le Maréchal 8 , Jean-François Taly 9 , Wilfrid Carre 10 , Claire Bardel 11 , Frederic Tran Mau-Them 6 , Marc Planes 12 , Marie-Pierre Audrezet 12 , Laure Raymond 9 , Charles Coutton 13 , Pierre Ray 13 , Veronique Satre 13 , Klaus Dietrich 13 , Isabelle Marey 13 , Françoise Devillard 13 , Radu Harbuz 13 , Florence Amblard 13 , Pauline Le Tanno 13 , Mouna Barat-Houari 14 , Marjolaine Willems 14 , Thomas Guignard 14 , Sylvie Odent 15 , Marie de Tayrac 10 , Damien Sanlaville 7 , Laurence Faivre 6 , Laurent Mesnard 16…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases came from five types of resources [34][35][36][37][38], such as the American Journal of Human Genetics Article, Columbia University Medical Center, and the Department of Genomic Diagnostics at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. For Cohorts 3-5, we used the same data cohort as Chen et al [30] group [42][43][44]. For Cohort 6, we used the same data cohort as Yuan et al [45].…”
Section: Evaluation Datasets Of True Diagnostically Validated Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second category of phenotype methods also aims to find relationships between phenotypes and candidate genes for prioritizing candidate genes, but without identifying the disease first. Typical examples of the second category include Phenolyzer [27], Phen2Gene [28], AMELIE [29], and PhenoApt [30]. Compared with these methods, the first category of approaches provides good interpretability, which is the focus of our work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then compared PhenoGenius to four recently published algorithms for phenotype-driven gene prioritization: PhenoApt, Phen2Gene, CADA, and LIRICAL 7,[15][16][17] . Despite using different prioritization methodologies, these four programs demonstrated similar performances in phenotype matching (Figure 5C).…”
Section: Symptom Interaction Models As An Efficient and Robust System...mentioning
confidence: 99%