2007
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2007.0178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase stability of heteroepitaxial polydomain BaTiO3 thin films

Abstract: The phase stability of ferroelectric, epitaxial, polydomain BaTiO 3 thin films was examined using temperature-dependent x-ray diffraction (XRD) and in-plane electronic polarization measurements. The epitaxial BaTiO 3 thin films were grown on MgO(100) substrates by a metal-organic chemical vapor deposition process. As-deposited and annealed BaTiO 3 thin films with different domain structures were examined. Temperature-dependent plane-normal XRD analysis reveals well-defined phase transitions at 140 and 169°C in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of T c is due to the presence of tensile stress36, owing to the thermal expansion coefficient difference between film and substrate, as it is evidenced by XRD analysis. The moderate increase in transition temperatures is consistent with the Landau-Ginsburg-Devonshire theory for polydomain thin films with residual misfit strain less than 0.2%37. In our case, the increase of T c is predominantly due to the thermal tensile strain, which was calculated from the XRD analysis and is equal to 0.3%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The increase of T c is due to the presence of tensile stress36, owing to the thermal expansion coefficient difference between film and substrate, as it is evidenced by XRD analysis. The moderate increase in transition temperatures is consistent with the Landau-Ginsburg-Devonshire theory for polydomain thin films with residual misfit strain less than 0.2%37. In our case, the increase of T c is predominantly due to the thermal tensile strain, which was calculated from the XRD analysis and is equal to 0.3%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%