2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phantom-less QCT BMD system as screening tool for osteoporosis without additional radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, heterogeneous or varying density values of muscle and fat, which are used as reference standards, due to differences in hydration status can influence the measurements [14]. In accordance with that, previous studies have already shown that intravenous contrast media administration also leads to higher BMD values measured on routine MDCT scans [15 -18].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, heterogeneous or varying density values of muscle and fat, which are used as reference standards, due to differences in hydration status can influence the measurements [14]. In accordance with that, previous studies have already shown that intravenous contrast media administration also leads to higher BMD values measured on routine MDCT scans [15 -18].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This saves the patient from additional radiation exposure. Furthermore, beam-hardening and scatter effects, which might be induced by an external phantom, do not play a role in phantom-less BMD measurement methods [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the modified QCT methodology (phantomless) also is acceptable to assess BMD, but the calibration factors need to be calculated for a given scanner before or after the studies [36,40,41]. The psoas or fat tissue of paravertibrae can be used as a calibration mark [38,39]. Further studies well be needed to demonstrate the role of QCT in predicting fracture risk and monitoring anti-osteoporosis by using BMD, micro-architectural and mechanical assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, high-precision results were found in most studies. The average coefficient variation of a precision error (CV% by RMS or SD/mean methods) was b3% from 1.8 to 4.0% in most studies [8,21,38,77,78,82,83]. The precision error among scan parameters can be limited to 2% of CV.…”
Section: Precision Of the Qct In Central Peripheral And Ctdx Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation