1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01699402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pesticide exposure to a greenhouse drencher

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…that the amount of ethazole breaking through both cloths is similar [20,29,30], Comparison of non-treated against coated coveralls using a fluorescence method indicated that the coating much reduced the amounts penetrating by 1 h of use [27], As is recognised from other, more gen eral statements [17], choice of coverall material therefore…”
Section: Air Levels Of Pesticide During and At The End Of Sprayingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…that the amount of ethazole breaking through both cloths is similar [20,29,30], Comparison of non-treated against coated coveralls using a fluorescence method indicated that the coating much reduced the amounts penetrating by 1 h of use [27], As is recognised from other, more gen eral statements [17], choice of coverall material therefore…”
Section: Air Levels Of Pesticide During and At The End Of Sprayingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Etridiazole is sold as the active ingredient in numerous commercial pesticides such as terrazole, Truban, and Banrot and has been used on golf courses, cotton ornaments, lawns, and agricultural seed products . In addition to occupational exposures, etridiazole can be present in water and air near sites where it is frequently applied, , which may lead to low levels of intermittent exposure in the general population. Etridiazole is not typically found on food, , which suggests that the observed exposure is unlikely to be a result of confounding via dietary patterns and associated habits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a con ned space, greenhouse application also is considered a high exposure risk. Stamper and colleagues presented individual, nonpooled exposure results for greenhouse applicators using ne-spray six-nozzle handguns (Stamper et al 1989a) and low-pressure single-nozzle handgun drenchers (Stamper et al 1989b) to apply Mavrik 22.3% EC ( uvalinate), Dursban 50% WP (chlorpyrifos), Truban 30% WP (ethazol), Kelthane 18.5% EC (dicofol), and Daconil 75% WP (chlorothalonil). All nineteen ethazol air samples were detectable, with respiratory exposure accounting for 82 ¹g/hr on average, or nearly 5% of total exposure.…”
Section: Applicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%