a b s t r a c tInhaled aerosol dose models play critical roles in medicine, the regulation of air pollutants and basic research. The models fall into several categories: traditional, computational fluid dynamical (CFD), physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK), empirical, semi-empirical, and "reference". Each type of model has its strengths and weaknesses, so multiple models are commonly used for practical applications. Aerosol dose models combine information on aerosol behavior and the anatomy and physiology of exposed human and laboratory animal subjects. Similar models are used for in-vitro studies. Several notable advances have been made in aerosol dose modeling in the past 80 years. The pioneers include Walter Findeisen, who in 1935 published the first traditional model and established the structure of modern models. His model combined aerosol behavior with simplified respiratory tract structures. Ewald Weibel established morphometric techniques for the lung in 1963 that are still used to develop data for modeling today. Advances in scanning techniques have similarly contributed to the knowledge of respiratory tract structure and its use in aerosol dose modeling. Several scientists and research groups have developed and advanced traditional, CFD, and PBPK models. Current issues under study include understanding individual and species differences; examining localized particle deposition; modeling non-ideal aerosols and nanoparticle behavior; linking the regions of the respiratory tract airways from nasal-oral to alveolar; and developing sophisticated supporting software. Although a complete history of inhaled aerosol dose modeling is far too extensive to cover here, selected highlights are described in this paper.

No abstract

No abstract

Coumarins in the rind and pulp of Persian and Key limes were quantified. In the rind of Persian limes, coumarin concentrations were in the order: limettin > bergapten > isopimpinellin > xanthotoxin > psoralen. In the rind of Key limes, psoralen and xanthotoxin were analytically absent; limettin was 10 times more concentrated than either bergapten or isopimpinellin, which were equal in concentration. Coumarin content in Persian lime pulp was in the order: isopimpinellin > limettin > bergapten > xanthotoxin > psoralen. For Key lime pulp, the concentrations of limettin, isopimpinellin and bergapten were equal; psoralen and xanthotoxin were not detected. Coumarins in lime pulp were 13 to 182 times less concentrated than those in the peel. Based on the amounts and types of coumarins, Persian limes appear to be potentially more phototoxic than Key limes. Although bergapten may be the main component of limes responsible for phytophotodermatitis, dermatological interaction assays with psoralen, bergapten, xanthotoxin and limettin should be conducted.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Florida Entomological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Florida Entomologist. ABSTRACTOver 10 weeks, 765 adult, feral Diaprepes abbreviatus were captured from 750 young citrus trees by dislodging them into inverted umbrellas. Newly captured weevils were distributed evenly among plots throughout the experimental site. Five hundred eighty of these weevils were marked and released; 146 were recovered. Recaptured (marked) weevils tended to stay close to the release point. Because recaptured weevils were not homogenously distributed, a mark-release method for a population estimation was untenable. Weevils were recaptured at distances up to 120 m from the release point, the farthest distance checked. There were no differences between males and females in the numbers and distances moved. Marked females were recovered at the experimental site over a longer time period than marked males. Weevils were recaptured within 6 weeks of marking, but none after 6 weeks from first capture. Over the 10 week experimental period, Malaise and Tedders traps captured 0 and 2 weevils, respectively, compared to the 765 weevils captured with the beat method. Average adults per tree ranged from 0.016 to 0.376 per week with an overall average of 0.172 ? 0.140, enough adult weevils to thoroughly infest all trees with larvae.

Extracts of 22 fruits were tested for their attractancy toAnastrepha suspensa (Loew), the Caribbean fruit fly. Box-orange, calamondin, carambola, cattley guava, loquat, and Surinam-cherry were about equal in attractiveness to males and females. Nine synthetic chemicals, including four found in box-orange ripe seed, were attractive to females. Five synthetic chemicals, including two in box-orange ripe seed, were attractive to males. Farnesol,α-phellandrene, and 3-carene were highest in attractiveness to both males and females. Females were more attracted than males to 12 synthetic chemicals. These data suggest that host chemicals serve as attractants and that female and male specific attractants and traps could be developed from host kairomone data. These data also suggest that the volatilization of chemicals from water may play an important role in kairomone biology.

Aqueous extracts ofLantana camara L. leaves inhibited ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) germination and seedling growth. Phytotoxic compounds were fractionated from crude aqueous extracts and fractions were evaluated for their phytotoxicity. Inhibition was most pronounced with the alkaline and acid hydrolysates. Plant inhibition by the crude extract reflected a complex interaction of numerous individual components of diverse chemical compositions and potencies. Presumptive identification of the individual components was accomplished with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Thirteen phenolic compounds were identified, and most of these compounds were phytotoxic to ryegrass seedlings. Radicle elongation was more sensitive to the toxins than shoot elongation.

Hydration of the skin during the preparation of limeade combined with increased levels of bergapten in local limes to produce a dramatic bullous reaction. We encourage clinicians to consider the possibility of phytophotodermatitis in severe bullous skin reactions.