Pesticide Exposure of Residents Living Close to Agricultural Fields in the Netherlands: Protocol for an Observational Study

Abstract

Background Application of pesticides in the vicinity of homes has caused concern regarding possible health effects in residents living nearby. However, the high spatiotemporal variation of pesticide levels and lack of knowledge regarding the contribution of exposure routes greatly complicates exposure assessment approaches. Objective The objective of this paper was to describe the study protocol of a large exposure survey in the Netherlands assessing pesticide exposure of residents living close (<250 m) to agricultural fields; to better understand possible routes of exposure; to develop an integrative exposure model for residential exposure; and to describe lessons learned. Methods We performed an observational study involving residents living in the vicinity of agricultural fields and residents living more than 500 m away from any agricultural fields (control subjects). Residential exposures were measured both during a pesticide use period after a specific application and during the nonuse period for 7 and 2 days, respectively. We collected environmental samples (outdoor and indoor air, dust, and garden and field soils) and personal samples (urine and hand wipes). We also collected data on spraying applications as well as on home characteristics, participants' demographics, and food habits via questionnaires and diaries. Environmental samples were analyzed for 46 prioritized pesticides. Urine samples were analyzed for biomarkers of a subset of 5 pesticides. Alongside the field study, and by taking spray events and environmental data into account, we developed a modeling framework to estimate environmental exposure of residents to pesticides. Results Our study was conducted between 2016 and 2019. We assessed 96 homes and 192 participants, including 7 growers and 28 control subjects. We followed 14 pesticide applications, applying 20 active ingredients. We collected 4416 samples: 1018 air, 445 dust (224 vacuumed floor, 221 doormat), 265 soil (238 garden, 27 fields), 2485 urine, 112 hand wipes, and 91 tank mixtures. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study on residents’ exposure to pesticides addressing all major nondietary exposure sources and routes (air, soil, dust). Our protocol provides insights on used sampling techniques, the wealth of data collected, developed methods, modeling framework, and lessons learned. Resources and data are open for future collaborations on this important topic. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/27883

A Critical Scoping Review of Pesticide Exposure Biomonitoring Studies in Overhead Cultures

“…The eligibility criteria for the selection of studies were based on analyses of existing extensive biomonitoring studies such as Figueiredo et al [21], Vermeulen et al [16] and Galea et al [10,19,22,23]. In short, studies deficient in one or more of the following criteria were excluded:…”

Collection of human and environmental data on pesticide use in Europe and Argentina: Field study protocol for the SPRINT project

“…For human exposure modelling, the OBO exposure module will be used. This module consists of an a priori defined set of equations [ 29 ] and includes both human specific input and some more general and specific inputs from CSS. A brief summary of the model input is presented below:…”

Exposure to Pesticides Predicts Prodromal Feature of Parkinson's Disease: Public Health Implications

“…Furthermore, previous studies show that people are rarely exposed to a single pesticide but, rather, to "cocktails" (mixtures) of different pesticides. 28 In fact, a previous study found virtually no associations between individual pesticides and the performance on motor or cognitive tests, but did find an association of overall pesticide exposure with these outcomes. 29 Mixtures of pesticides may well be associated with additive toxicity and possibly even have a synergistic effect.…”

“…Studies in the general population have given mixed results, with some studies reporting that individuals who live in agricultural regions have an increased risk of PD, 26,27 suggesting that exposure to pesticides may contribute to the etiology of PD not only in farmers but also in a considerably larger proportion of PD cases. Furthermore, previous studies show that people are rarely exposed to a single pesticide but, rather, to “cocktails” (mixtures) of different pesticides 28 . In fact, a previous study found virtually no associations between individual pesticides and the performance on motor or cognitive tests, but did find an association of overall pesticide exposure with these outcomes 29 .…”