1999
DOI: 10.1007/s004020050419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periprosthetic bone remodelling after total knee arthroplasty: early assessment by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Abstract: The present investigation aims to evaluate periprosthetic bone remodelling after total knee arthroplasty by the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Twelve patients affected by osteoarthrosis of the knee joint underwent primary total knee arthroplasty at an average age of 70.5 years. None of them had received a knee prosthesis before on the contralateral side. Anteroposterior and lateral DXA measurements of the femur, tibia and total knee (both sides) were taken 2 weeks, 3 and 9 months postoperativel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same effect occurred in valgus knees. Studies with controls [5,6,9,20] have found no evidence of BMD change either in the contralateral knee or spine after TKA. This implies a local effect attributable to the implant and changes in mechanical alignment as opposed to a global BMD change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same effect occurred in valgus knees. Studies with controls [5,6,9,20] have found no evidence of BMD change either in the contralateral knee or spine after TKA. This implies a local effect attributable to the implant and changes in mechanical alignment as opposed to a global BMD change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual-energy xray absorptiometry (DEXA) studies suggest proximal tibial BMD declines after TKA [1,5,9,12,17,[19][20][21]. However, it is not clear whether there are differences in BMD changes between cortical and cancellous bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors [4,11] found significant bone density decrease in the periprosthetic tibial area during the followup. Tibial bone loss can be caused by load changes on the metaphyseal bone, and long-term studies show that after an initial stable period, the bone density of the proximal tibia consistently decreased at a rate of 5% per year [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone density is unreliable on plain radiographs. Changes in bone density must exceed 20-50% in order to be visually observable on standard radiographs (Mintzer et al 1990, Robertson et al 1994, Petersen et al 1995, Lewis et al 1998, Karbowski et al 1999, Spittlehouse et al 1999, Soininvaara et al 2000.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%