sequelae and improves patient comfort. Dexamethasone 4 mg given intravenously is an effective way of minimizing swelling and trismus after removal of impacted lower third molars. Submucosal hydrocortisone is effective in preventing excess swelling but its role against trismus and pain are questionable. Both modalities offer simple, safe, painless, noninvasive, and cost-effective treatment means to counteract postoperative discomfort.Keywords: Dexamethasone, Hydrocortisone, Impacted mandibular third molars.How to cite this article: Raakesh N, Ravi V, Ushass P, Painatt JM, Kumar VM, Sasikumar P, Subhash AK, Navya P.
Source of support: Nil
Conflict of interest: None
INTRODUCTIONSurgical removal of third molars accounts for a large volume of cases in contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgical practice. It requires meticulous planning and application of surgical skills during both diagnosis and postoperative management.
1Odontectomy of mandibular third molar is generally followed by pain, trismus, and swelling. Pain is subjective and can be influenced by different factors such as age, sex, anxiety, and surgical difficulty. Pain usually begins within 3 hours after surgery and ranges in intensity from moderate to severe. This procedure can also result in significant edema and inflammation in the operative field. Corticosteroids have numerous effects on body function. The normal rate of production of hydrocortisone is 15 to 30 mg/day and it increases up to 300 mg during stress. For inflammation to be suppressed, exogenous hydrocortisone must be administered in doses exceeding the normal physiological amounts of hydrocortisone released. Several researchers have found that hydrocortisone prevents inflammation following oral surgery. Dexamethasone is a synthetic corticosteroid with much greater anti-inflammatory effect. The potency of dexamethasone is about 30 times that of natural corticosteroid.3 Postoperative swelling and edema are due to the conversion of phospholipids into arachidonic acid by
ABSTRACTIntroduction: Surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar is a common procedure in routine maxillofacial practice. This procedure is generally followed by pain, trismus, and swelling. Various methods have been attempted to reduce these unfavorable postoperative sequelae and to improve patient comfort in postoperative period. Use of steroids is one of the commonly followed practices. In our study, we compare the efficiency of steroids given preoperatively in reducing postoperative sequelae, when given in equivalent steroid doses.