2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.850606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perhaps the FOMC Did What it Said it Did: An Alternative Interpretation of the Great Inflation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation methodology is also discussed in the appendix of Kozicki and Tinsley (2007) 7 Following Ravn and Uhlig (2002), the Hodrick-Prescott smoothing parameter is 2 4 x 1600 = 25, 600, as the FOMC has met at least eight times a year during the sample used.…”
Section: A Framework For Estimating Policy Rate Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation methodology is also discussed in the appendix of Kozicki and Tinsley (2007) 7 Following Ravn and Uhlig (2002), the Hodrick-Prescott smoothing parameter is 2 4 x 1600 = 25, 600, as the FOMC has met at least eight times a year during the sample used.…”
Section: A Framework For Estimating Policy Rate Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the equilibrium interest rate was high, perhaps it is because the central bank's implicit target for inflation was low. To investigate this possibility, I adopt the approach of Kozicki and Tinsley (2007) to derive an implicit inflation target. Starting from , and setting i = 0, 1, combine it with a dynamic adjustment of the interest rate modelled as where is the equilibrium real interest rate, and all other terms are previously defined.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unemployment rate appears to be an appropriate summary measure of real activity because, as discussed in Kozicki and Tinsley (2007), it seems likely that the FOMC used aggregate unemployment as a measure of resource slack. Moreover, the change in the unemployment rate provides a proxy for economic growth.…”
Section: Empirical Responses Of Forward Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarida, Gali, and Gertler (2000), Lubik and Schorfheide (2004), and Kozicki and Tinsley (2007) provide empirical evidence that in the period before Paul Volcker was appointed Chairman of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the Federal Reserve, 4 nominal policy rates exhibited a passive, or inelastic, response (i.e., less than one-for-one) with respect to inflation. However, in the broader context of bond rate transmission, it seems important to consider also the responsiveness of bond rates to inflation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%