2001
DOI: 10.13031/2013.6848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the Watermark. Granular Matri X Sensor in Sandy Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important limitation for the use of Watermark in the predominantly coarse-textured soils. These results obtained agree with (Hanson et al, 2000;Irmak and Haman, 2001;Leib et al, 2001;Intrigliolo and Castel, 2004). Generally, soil sensors overly different from each other, mainly when the soil type is sand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is an important limitation for the use of Watermark in the predominantly coarse-textured soils. These results obtained agree with (Hanson et al, 2000;Irmak and Haman, 2001;Leib et al, 2001;Intrigliolo and Castel, 2004). Generally, soil sensors overly different from each other, mainly when the soil type is sand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Despite Watermark and tensiometer following the major pattern of soil water content and being low cost to purchase they did perform satisfactorily in this region. Increasing the number of duplications and careful and frequent calibration could possibly make these methods more acceptable (Leib et al, 2003;Irmak and Haman, 2001) if continuous measurements must be made. Finally, it is important to remember that in the soil moisture sensor-experiment, due to favorable weather conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…O monitoramento dos dados foi feito entre novembro/02 e abril/03, totalizando 50 eventos. Para monitoramento da umidade do solo foram instalados blocos de resistência elétrica, que fornecem leituras de tensão da água no solo (Irmak & Haman, 2001), em 12 pontos na microbacia, nas profundidades de 20, 50 e 80 cm, sendo 8 na área ocupada por pastagem e 4 na área plantada com eucalipto. Amostras em cada ponto e profundidade foram coletadas para determinação das respectivas curvas características; os dados de tensão também o foram a cada 2 dias, convertidos em umidade volumétrica e transformados em umidade relativa do perfil do solo, segundo Brandes & Wilcox (2000): em que: θ r é a umidade residual (PMP), θ s , a umidade de saturação e , θ v a umidade volumétrica média no perfil do solo.…”
Section: Características Morfométricas E Monitoramento Hidroló-gico Dunclassified
“…Irmak & Haman (2001) evaluated five Watermark ® granular matrix sensors, which are also SWT-based sensors, in two soils and obtained a CV of sensor resistance of 5.1 and 7.7%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%