2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of ERA5 reanalysis precipitation products in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao greater Bay Area, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For different precipitation intensities, ERA5 and IMERG showed shortcomings of overestimating weak and underestimating high-intensity precipitation, which has been reported for eastern China 130 , 131 , the Himalayas 132 , North America 35 , and Central Asia 133 . The overestimation of weak precipitation can be explained by reasons for overall overestimation above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For different precipitation intensities, ERA5 and IMERG showed shortcomings of overestimating weak and underestimating high-intensity precipitation, which has been reported for eastern China 130 , 131 , the Himalayas 132 , North America 35 , and Central Asia 133 . The overestimation of weak precipitation can be explained by reasons for overall overestimation above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Many studies are concentrating on the evaluation of ERA5-Land in different regions. Xin et al (2021) evaluated and compared the ability of two ERA5 precipitation products, ERA5-Land and ERA5-HRES, in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) using observations from over 3000 rain gauges in a high-density network during 2018, and the results showed that ERA5-Land data with finer spatial resolution fail to deliver any preferable results than ERA5-HRES. Zou et al (2022) evaluated the ERA5-Land air temperature data in the GBA by using the observations of 1080 automatic weather stations in 2018, and the results showed that ERA5-Land underestimates temperature (an average bias of 0.90 °C) and performs better at low temperatures than at high temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al (2022) showed that the spatial patterns of annual precipitation of ERA-5-Land and ERA-5 in mainland China were similar, but their statistical indicators (e.g., correlation coefficient, root mean square error, probability of detection, and false alarm ratio) of ERA-5-Land reanalysis precipitation data were superior to ERA-5. Xin et al (2021) explored the applicability of ERA-5-Land reanalysis data in the Greater Bay Area based on precipitation, and the results showed that ERA-5-Land reanalysis precipitation data could better describe the spatial distribution and temporal variation trend of monthly precipitation. Zhang et al (2021) showed that although ERA-5 reanalysis precipitation data overestimated precipitation, it had high simulation accuracy in the monitoring of drought and heat wave events in South China.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%