2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of different optimization concepts for reactive flow systems based on combined CFD and response surface methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve the reactor model, the ANSYS Fluent computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software is utilized, which has found in recent years extensive application in the modeling of reactive flows. To analyze for the UV radiation profiles in the reactor, we employ the Discrete Ordinates (DO) component in ANSYS Fluent to solve the RTE. In ANSYS Fluent, the geometry of the problem is divided into certain control volumes (cells) and the CFD software solves the transport/reaction equations (including the radiation transfer equation, eq ) in each control volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the reactor model, the ANSYS Fluent computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software is utilized, which has found in recent years extensive application in the modeling of reactive flows. To analyze for the UV radiation profiles in the reactor, we employ the Discrete Ordinates (DO) component in ANSYS Fluent to solve the RTE. In ANSYS Fluent, the geometry of the problem is divided into certain control volumes (cells) and the CFD software solves the transport/reaction equations (including the radiation transfer equation, eq ) in each control volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rößger and Richter [25] have thoroughly compared state of the art CFD-based optimization methods based on a 2-parameter design problem. For that specific problem it has been demonstrated that direct optimization based on CFD simulation would require 1000 CFD simulations, which is computationally prohibitive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can address complex black-box problems, such as reactor geometry [16,17] or impeller configuration [18], but require a large number of function evaluations, which leads to a large number of computationally expensive CFD runs. To improve the computational efficiency of direct CFD simulations, hybrid methods have been proposed that replace direct CFD evaluation with simpler data-driven models [21][22][23][24][25], which are then integrated with GA. Successful implementation have been reported in the literature that use neural network [22,23], Gaussian process [24] and radial basis function (RBF) [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is notorious for being computationally expensive. One CFD calculation can take days or even weeks to complete, even with modern computing power [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%