2016
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanol

Abstract: This research evaluated the performance of a diesel engine in an agricultural tractor, using Diesel S500 (B5) and mixture with 3% (ED3), 6% (ED6), 9% (ED9), 12% (ED12) and RESUMO Neste trabalho, foi avaliado o desempenho de um motor ciclo Diesel de um trator agrícola, utilizando óleo Diesel S500 (B5) e sua mistura com 3% (ED3), 6% (ED6), 9% (ED9), 12% (ED12) e 15% (ED15) de etanol hidratado. As variáveis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al (2019) reported that MR decreased and torque increased, which corroborates the present study because, given the non-significance of MR, there was no change in the generated torque, and consequently no change in HFC and SFC. Similar results were obtained by Estrada et al (2016) when evaluating the performance of a diesel engine using different hydrated ethanol mixtures. Martins et al (2018) measured the energy performance of an agricultural tractor using an offset disk harrow and found no significant differences in DF, corroborating the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Li et al (2019) reported that MR decreased and torque increased, which corroborates the present study because, given the non-significance of MR, there was no change in the generated torque, and consequently no change in HFC and SFC. Similar results were obtained by Estrada et al (2016) when evaluating the performance of a diesel engine using different hydrated ethanol mixtures. Martins et al (2018) measured the energy performance of an agricultural tractor using an offset disk harrow and found no significant differences in DF, corroborating the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…На ED15 мощность снизилась на 6,3 %, а расход топлива возрос на 3,77 %, как и на B5. С увеличением содержания этанола в В5 произошло снижение запаса скорости и индекса эластичности двигателя, а значение крутящего момента двигателя стало выше [7].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Перед началом испытаний трактор был укомплектован в соответствии с требованиями завода-изготовителя; было установлено требуемое давление в шинах, проверена высота почвозацепов, трактор был прогрет под нагрузкой в течение 30 мин. ДТ и смазочные материалы, применяемые в тракторе при испытаниях, соответствовали эксплуатационной документации на трактор [7][8][9] .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Considering the price paid for one liter of mineral diesel, the consumption reduction, and consequently, the cost of tractor work are important to justify the use of the SUTB strategy instead of FT. In addition, fuel combustion is an important source of pollutant gas emission (Estrada et al, 2016), resulting in considerable impact on the environment and human health (Lindgren et al, 2011).…”
Section: Travel Speed (Km H -1 )mentioning
confidence: 99%