Public Management in Britain 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-27574-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Management, Quality Management and Contracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the auditing of outcomes tends to be displaced by Butterfield et al: The NPM and the UK police service 397 easily measurable outputs, and Smith (1995) has argued that it is still impossible to measure intangible outcomes. None the less, the search for solutions to this problem continues with complex systems models becoming increasingly popular (Carter et al 1995;Rouse 1999;Boland and Fowler 2000).…”
Section: The Place Of Performance Management Within the New Public Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the auditing of outcomes tends to be displaced by Butterfield et al: The NPM and the UK police service 397 easily measurable outputs, and Smith (1995) has argued that it is still impossible to measure intangible outcomes. None the less, the search for solutions to this problem continues with complex systems models becoming increasingly popular (Carter et al 1995;Rouse 1999;Boland and Fowler 2000).…”
Section: The Place Of Performance Management Within the New Public Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective is thus to achieve legitimacy by satisfying at least minimum performance norms [10]. Profit-oriented companies as well as not-for-profit organizations tend to perceive performance as a multidimensional phenomenon [37,54]. In profit-oriented firms the financial or value perspective (economy) is often the dominant dimension.…”
Section: Organizational Design and Situativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But what is performance in the context of healthcare? As the goals of healthcare organizations often are not clearly defined and the value of healthcare service delivery is difficult to allocate, performance management literature tends to use the three E's − economy, efficiency, and effectiveness − to define performance for the non-for-profit context (Carter et al, 1995;Flynn, 1997;Rouse, 1999). Performance therefore has to be perceived as a multidimensional phenomenon, where the financial, respectively value perspective (economy) is only one dimension of the whole.…”
Section: Hospital Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%