2006
DOI: 10.1109/ias.2006.256807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of IPMSM with distributed and concentrated windings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inductance difference (L d -L q ) of the flux-concentrating structure motor, e.g. spoke-type PM and V-type motor, is normally smaller than in conventional IPM motors, such that some papers analyse their electromagnetic characteristics with no d-axis current or current phase angle (CPA) = 0° [23][24][25]. However, this paper analyses motor performance as a function of CPA as well as magnitude because d-axis current affects core loss as well as torque.…”
Section: Torque Analysis With the Magnet Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inductance difference (L d -L q ) of the flux-concentrating structure motor, e.g. spoke-type PM and V-type motor, is normally smaller than in conventional IPM motors, such that some papers analyse their electromagnetic characteristics with no d-axis current or current phase angle (CPA) = 0° [23][24][25]. However, this paper analyses motor performance as a function of CPA as well as magnitude because d-axis current affects core loss as well as torque.…”
Section: Torque Analysis With the Magnet Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is well known and is widely used as it enables having a stator magneto motive force (MMF) with low space harmonic content. However, it induces important end coil lengths and thus non-negligible stator Joule losses (Kwon et al, 2006). FSCW allows reducing the end parts and the copper Use of current sheet 1329 used but due to the coil spatial distribution, the harmonic content of the stator MMF and hence of the air gap flux density is higher than the one of DW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers have compared the performance of concentrated and distributed windings applied to IPM motors, amongst which most have addressed the extra core and magnet losses as well as acoustic noise and vibration due to the additional Magneto Motive Force (MMF) harmonics associated with the concentrated windings, [17], [19], [20]. In [21]- [24], the torque-speed performance of a distributed winding is reported to be superior to a concentrated winding in both constant torque and constant power region, due to the higher saliency ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%