2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2016.0763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of a spoke‐type PM motor with different permanent magnet shapes and the same magnet volume

Abstract: This study investigates the characteristics of a spoke-type permanent magnet (PM) motor with one of three magnet shapes, rectangular magnet (RM), trapezoidal magnet (TM), or inverted TM (ITM) in order to compare motor performance for the same magnet volume. The three magnet shapes vary in terms of upper thickness, lower thickness, and width of the magnet. Two-dimensional (2D) finite element method is performed to analyse torque, inductance, core loss, efficiency, and demagnetisation reliability. Advantages and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Taguchi optimisation algorithm can obtain the best solution though less simulation times. This algorithm can be simplified from 3 3 ¼ 27 simulation times to 9 simulation times to find the optimal solution. The target optimised design variables are expressed as α, β and W pm3 , respectively.…”
Section: Taguchi Optimisation Of Permanent Magnet Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Taguchi optimisation algorithm can obtain the best solution though less simulation times. This algorithm can be simplified from 3 3 ¼ 27 simulation times to 9 simulation times to find the optimal solution. The target optimised design variables are expressed as α, β and W pm3 , respectively.…”
Section: Taguchi Optimisation Of Permanent Magnet Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rotor topologies used are the surface mounted PM rotor, capped PM rotor, and spoke PM. While there are many other topologies to choose from and variations on each of them, see e.g., [13][14][15][16]18,19,23,24], the three chosen topologies are all relatively simple. All three topologies allow the PM to be represented as a rectangular block with a well defined height and width, along and across magnetisation, respectively.…”
Section: Geometries and Rotor Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the cross‐sectional area of the PMs within a limited rotor size is crucial for increasing the flux per pole of the PMSM. Components must also be arranged to prevent flux offset in the inserted PMs [15–17]. Therefore, merely combining SPM‐ and spoke‐type motors increases the cross‐sectional area of the PM, but does not increase the flux per pole [12].…”
Section: Comparison Of Improved Rotor Type and Three Rotor Typementioning
confidence: 99%