Performance benchmarking in gas distribution industry

Abstract

PurposeThe paper aims to research the capability of using the tools of domestic and international performance benchmarking for estimation of efficiency, determine its key factors and reveal the full reserves of inputs reduction and potential growth efficiency for gas distribution companies.Design/methodology/approachIn the research, three models of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and other tools of performance benchmarking are used to analyse the efficiency of gas distribution companies. Some factors are examined for their impact on efficiency. There are the scale, regional location, property category and other endogenous and exogenous factors. The results are based on the samples of 54 Ukrainian and 20 US gas distribution companies.FindingsInternational benchmarking vastly expand performance improvement for domestic companies. The results of analysis and tools of this research allows to widen the capability of reduced consumption of various inputs by 10 per cent and provide the general gain of Ukrainian gas distribution company's and industry efficiency two times as much.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is limited by single industry and by relatively short data set. The former is explained by requirement of technology (product and service) homogeneity when using DEA tools. The latter is connected with specificity of the industry and generally little numbers of firms in it.Practical implicationThe results of researching contain the data and recommendations to optimal scale, best proprietors makeup, specific reserves of input reduction for each company that was analysed. These results can be practicable for companies' management, present and potential investors and proprietors, regulative public authority. It is possible to use results of this research to make benchmarking for the other industries.Originality/valueThis is the first paper that adopts the various DEA models for measuring of efficiency in gas distribution industry of Ukraine and the tools of international benchmarking for Ukrainian and US companies.

Are Public-Private Partnerships a Source of Greater Efficiency in Water Supply? Results of a Non-Parametric Performance Analysis Relating to the Italian Industry

“…In the first stage, a conventional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model was used to evaluate the water service operator efficiency, while in the second stage the influence of environmental factors on efficiency was investigated implementing a bootstrapped DEA procedure [42]. Since its introduction by Charnes et al [43], Data Envelopment Analysis as a non-parametric technique has been extensively used for measuring efficiency in the public utilities sector to identify and design policy measures (see, for instance [44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”

Labour management for a restaurant using data envelopment analysis

“…DEA has been widely used for measuring and benchmarking the relative efficiency of various entities. Selected DEA applications include assessing the efficiency of bank branches (Paradi et al, 2011), advertising (Pergelova et al, 2010), hospitals (Aksezer and Benneyan, 2010), suppliers (Joo et al, 2009), portfolios (Dia, 2009), hotels (Min et al, 2008), railway zones (George and Rangaraj, 2008), telecommunication service providers (Debnath and Ravi Shankar, 2008;Kwon et al, 2008), and utility companies (Goncharuk, 2008).…”

A Nonparametric Economic Analysis of the US Natural Gas Transmission Infrastructure: Efficiency, Trade-Offs and Emerging Industry Configurations

“…Results show that scale inefficiencies negatively affect the overall efficiency of gas operators, whereas technology shows increasing returns only for the smallest operators suggesting that efficiency improvement can be achieved by intensify the merging process and concentration that have characterized the early years of the 2000s. Goncharuk [16] developed three DEA models to calculate the efficiency in the gas industry distribution segment In Ukraine and US comparing 54 Ukrainian and 20 US operators. The author analyzed factors that have an impact on efficiency, e.g., scale, regional location, ownership, etc.…”