A Nonparametric Economic Analysis of the US Natural Gas Transmission Infrastructure: Efficiency, Trade-Offs and Emerging Industry Configurations

Abstract

This paper presents a study aimed at measuring the efficiency of the transmission segment of the US natural gas industry from an economic perspective. The gas transmission infrastructure is modeled as an economic production function and a multi-stage modeling approach based on the implementation of Data Envelopment Analysis is employed to obtain an efficiency measure in a two-dimension performance space, i.e., cost and revenue-efficiency. This approach allows taking into account conflicting business goals. The study also performs cluster analysis to uncover homogeneous efficiency profiles relative to the gas transmission systems to explore determinants of efficiency rates, and trade-off situations. A sample containing 80 US gas transmission systems is used in the analysis. Results indicate that the transmission segment of the US gas industry has considerable inefficiencies, while average cost and revenue-efficiency scores are 0.324 and 0.301, and only three transmission systems achieve high scores on both efficiency dimensions. Cluster analysis identified seven configurations. In three of them there are no trade-off situations between cost and revenue efficiencies. However, only in one of them gas transmission systems have high efficiencies. The remaining four configurations exhibit trade-off situations having different intensity. Such trade-offs can be determined by the gas transmission infrastructure size.

Regulatory lag, efficiency, and performance. Lessons from a case study

“…Hollas et al (2002), develop an efficiency estimate explaining gas consumption for the USA by user category from labor cost, capital cost, and volume of gas purchased, for the period 1975–1994. Also, for the United States, Lo Storto (2018) explains OPEX efficiency using as explanatory variables the network extension, the number of compressor stations, the volume of transported gas, and operating revenues. Erbetta and Rappuoli (2008) perform a DEA for the case of Italy for the period 1994–1999, estimating total cost efficiency, using as explanatory variables the number of customers and the volume of gas distributed and considering as environmental variables the density and the volume of gas distributed per customer.…”

Performance measurement of gas companies with fixed-sum inputs: a DEA-based model

“…Moreover, the output variables are delivered volumes, number of customers and percent installation gas. Lo Storto (2018) presented a multi-stage DEA study aimed to measuring the efficiency of the transmission segment of the US natural gas industry from an economic perspective. In this study, the amount of operating and maintenance expenses and gas volume transmitted are considered as input of first stage and output of second stage.…”

Integrated stochastic life cycle benefit cost analysis of hydronically-heated apron pavement system

“…where is annual energy consumption cost, A is HHPS paved area (m 2 ), is average energy use (kWh/m 2 ), is the number of snow events, e is the efficiency factor (0.85) (Cleaver Brooks, 2010;lo Storto, 2018), and is price of natural gas (USD/kWh), (values obtained from U.S EIA, 2018). Since there are many uncertainties associated with annual energy consumption (i.e., , , ), considering a discrete input for annual energy consumption cost in the economic analysis can introduce bias into the results.…”