The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and stability of an anaerobic fixed bed reactor subjected to progressive increasing concentrations of influent organic matter and organic shock loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…173 Immobilized biomass has shown a better response to organic shock loads and toxic pollutants, and in many cases, reactors employing immobilized biomass completely recover their performance after deleterious occurrences. 5 Furthermore, immobilized microorganisms have been found to remain more active in starvation periods and revealed a shorter lag phase after introduction of a degradable compound. 68,162 This has been attributed to a better biomass retention and higher cell density in immobilized biomass reactors, 163,169 which is particularly important for slow growing organisms that perform the biodegradation of xenobiotic compounds.…”
Section: Bioreactor Considerations For the Treatment Of Highly Variabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…173 Immobilized biomass has shown a better response to organic shock loads and toxic pollutants, and in many cases, reactors employing immobilized biomass completely recover their performance after deleterious occurrences. 5 Furthermore, immobilized microorganisms have been found to remain more active in starvation periods and revealed a shorter lag phase after introduction of a degradable compound. 68,162 This has been attributed to a better biomass retention and higher cell density in immobilized biomass reactors, 163,169 which is particularly important for slow growing organisms that perform the biodegradation of xenobiotic compounds.…”
Section: Bioreactor Considerations For the Treatment Of Highly Variabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has many advantages such as easy operation and maintenance, small area requirement, and lower sensitivity to fluctuation of influent loading as a consequence of higher concentration of biomass attached to the media. [5][6][7] In spite of their many advantages, however, clogging (i.e. increment of headloss) caused by biofilm growth in the reactor and accumulated solids are major drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMORIM et al (2005) concluded that there is a need for studies to determine the application limits of VOL for better utilization of useful volume of HAFBR, making it more economical. The half supporter contributes to the increase in the solid retention time, favoring the methanogenic population and, thus, increases the capacity of the horizontal reactor to resist organic shocks, changes in the characteristics of the substrate, and the presence of toxic compounds, but may also contribute to clogging of the reactor due to excessive retention of suspended solids (RODGERS et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%