Proceedings of the First ACM International Workshop on Smart, Autonomous, and Connected Vehicular Systems and Services 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2980100.2980103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and channel load evaluation for contextual pedestrian-to-vehicle transmissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out by a few efforts [3,14,49], network congestion can become severe with a large number of VRUs when all VRU devices actively participate in the V2P communication. To solve the network congestion issue, a few schemes, such as, Receive-only mode [3], contextual transmission [49], and clustering of VRUs [14] have been suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As pointed out by a few efforts [3,14,49], network congestion can become severe with a large number of VRUs when all VRU devices actively participate in the V2P communication. To solve the network congestion issue, a few schemes, such as, Receive-only mode [3], contextual transmission [49], and clustering of VRUs [14] have been suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Active Mechanism , VRU devices participate in V2P communication actively i.e., they transmit the safety messages periodically. This periodicity may be varied based on the context of the VRU [49]. In our scenario, we use fixed periodicity of 0.5 s.…”
Section: Case Study Of Crash Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the need for line-of-sight (LoS) restricts the proper operation of the sensing devices in the passive approach. Moreover, because the LoS condition cannot be ensured in all situations, the passive approach is unsuitable for several safety use cases, as previously pointed out by many authors [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Consequently, cooperative communication-based approaches, called cooperative intelligent transportation systems (C-ITS), have emerged as a suitable alternative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the case of DSRC, there are concerns about the suitability of the technology to support the increase in network traffic associated with VRU. These concerns are mainly because this technology already suffers from network congestion on the Control Channel—used for the exchange of safety packets—when the network density increases [ 4 , 5 , 19 ]. The problem may become critical in some countries, like the US, if the push to reduce the spectrum allocation for DSRC continues [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%