2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of an air quality CFD model in complex environments: Numerical simulation and experimental validation with EMU observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used this information to analyze the quantitative differences between models (e.g. Kumar and Feiz 2016). Figures 5 and 6 display the 1-min averaged concentrations of SF 6 over the whole domain predicted by each model at certain times after the first puff release in each intensive operating period.…”
Section: Modelling Sf 6 Dispersion Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used this information to analyze the quantitative differences between models (e.g. Kumar and Feiz 2016). Figures 5 and 6 display the 1-min averaged concentrations of SF 6 over the whole domain predicted by each model at certain times after the first puff release in each intensive operating period.…”
Section: Modelling Sf 6 Dispersion Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%