2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2015.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfect codes in thelpmetric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
20
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…An example where the inequality of Theorem 4 is strict can be given by considering the chain Z 2 6 ⊇ C 1 ⊇ C 2 , where C 1 = (1, 2) and C 2 = (2, 4) along with the parameters r 1 = 1, r 2 = 2 and h 1 = (4, 1), h 2 = (3, 0) ∈ Z 2 6 . In this example, it can be shown that min{6 2 , 3d 1 Lee , d 2 Lee } = 4 < 5 = d 1 min (Λ D ) < 6 2 . We remark that when the vectors h 1 , ..., h r a used in Construction D satisfy the hypotheses of Theorem 2, we can obtain the density of Λ D relative to l 1 -distance from Theorems 2 and 4.…”
Section: Connections Between Constructions D D and Dmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An example where the inequality of Theorem 4 is strict can be given by considering the chain Z 2 6 ⊇ C 1 ⊇ C 2 , where C 1 = (1, 2) and C 2 = (2, 4) along with the parameters r 1 = 1, r 2 = 2 and h 1 = (4, 1), h 2 = (3, 0) ∈ Z 2 6 . In this example, it can be shown that min{6 2 , 3d 1 Lee , d 2 Lee } = 4 < 5 = d 1 min (Λ D ) < 6 2 . We remark that when the vectors h 1 , ..., h r a used in Construction D satisfy the hypotheses of Theorem 2, we can obtain the density of Λ D relative to l 1 -distance from Theorems 2 and 4.…”
Section: Connections Between Constructions D D and Dmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We remark that Example 3 does not contradict the conjecture regarding Corollary 4. Indeed, we have (3,6), (6,3), (1,2), (4,8), (7,5), (2, 1), (5,7), (8,4)}.…”
Section: Connections Between Constructions D D and Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let p(n, e) = e i=1 2 i e−i+1 j=1 j 2 e−j i−1 n−1 i−1 . Rearranging the sum and using that a b = 0 for b > a we obtain the expression p(n, e) = e i=0 2i 2 k(n − 1, e − i) (2) for every n, e ≥ 1. In other words p(n, e) is the coefficient of x e of the convolution of the generating functions f (x) = ∞ i=0 2i 2 x i and g(x) = ∞ i=0 k(n − 1, i)x i .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caso contrário, podemos apenas garantir a existência de um conjunto minimal de geradores. Por exemplo, o código linear C = (2, 4) = {(0, 0), (2,4), (4, 2)} ⊆ Z 2 6 não possui base, uma vez que todo subconjunto não vazio de Cé linearmente dependente. Para cada par de vetores x = (x 1 , ..., x n ) e y = (y 1 , ..., y n ) em Z n q , o produto interno de x e yé definido como x, y = x 1 y 1 + • • • + x n y n .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified