1999
DOI: 10.1108/01435129910285145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions of quality service at the University of Botswana Library: what Nova says

Abstract: Reports a study to determine the perceptions of the clients of the University of Botswana Library as they relate to quality service, and how far the University Library has succeeded in delivering quality services. A questionnaire was used as the data-gathering instrument and is appended to the paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thapisa andGamini (1999: 380), citing Bicknell (1994), observe that 'libraries should never expect their clients to take information on the librarians' own terms; rather they should focus on what the customers like and how they (the librarians) can deliver it and should not try to train the customer to adapt to what the library offers'.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thapisa andGamini (1999: 380), citing Bicknell (1994), observe that 'libraries should never expect their clients to take information on the librarians' own terms; rather they should focus on what the customers like and how they (the librarians) can deliver it and should not try to train the customer to adapt to what the library offers'.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When it comes to the question of service quality of libraries, Hernon and Altman (1998) modified the SERVQUAL scale in their case study research on New Zealand and US libraries. Ashok (2007) replicated the work of Thapisa and Gamini (1999) using six dimensions of: responsiveness, reliability, assurance, empathy, communication and access. After that, a stream of studies was conducted to measure the service quality of libraries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, on a rating scale of between 1 to 5; where; 1 = Strongly disagree, to 5 = Strongly Agree [17,19]; or in the order of 1 = very low, to 5 = very high [20,21,22,23,24] respondents were asked to rate their satisfaction level in relation to the perceived library service quality for the given statements. The number in the ordinal scale only indicates the rank of order of the different categories and does not tell about the extent to which level is greater than the other level.…”
Section: B Overview Of Rasch Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%