Perbandingan Keefektifan Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik Dan Konvensional Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Penalaran Dan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa

Zaini, Ahmad; Marsigit, Marsigit

doi:10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2672

Cited by 20 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of the above study indicate that learning with a realistic mathematical approach gives a better impact than the open ended approach. Zaini, & Marsigit (2014) reveal that realistic mathematical approaches are better at improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Wibowo (2017) reinforces that this realistic approach has a more effective influence on students' mathematical reasoning abilities, learning achievement, and learning interest.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Comparison of Mathematical Students of SMP Students Between Learning Using a Realistic Approach With Using Open Ended Approach

Ramdhani

Rohaeti

2018

J. of Innovative Math. Learn.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to examine whether improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities that get learning by using a realistic mathematics education approach is better than students who get open ended learning. Method in this research is experiment method by using 2 sample. The sample was taken randomly, that is class VIII-C as a class that get learning by using realistic mathematics education approach, and class VIII-B as a class that get open ended learning. Instrument in this research is a test instrument in the form of description consists of 8 given problem in the form of pretest and postes, then the data of students' mathematical reasoning scores were analyzed by using the normality test of both groups then tested the homogeneity of two variance and the significance test of the difference of two averages. The final result of this study with a significance level of 0.05 concluded that the improvement of capability the mathematical reasoning of students who get learning by using a realistic mathematics education approach is better than students who get open ended learning.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Comparison of Mathematical Students of SMP Students Between Learning Using a Realistic Approach With Using Open Ended Approach

Ramdhani

Rohaeti

2018

J. of Innovative Math. Learn.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In essence, mathematics is an activity of tracing patterns and relationships (Zaini & Marsigit, 2014). This shows that mathematics learning really requires the reasoning abilities of students in tracing patterns and their relationships.…”

Section: Incorrect Answermentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving elementary students' mathematical reasoning abilities through sociohumanistic-based learning

Hidayat¹,

Wahyudin²,

Jailani³

et al. 2020

Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to determine the improvement of students' mathematical reasoning abilities through sociohumanistic-based learning. This research was a quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group design. The population in this study were all class IV in one elementary school in Salatiga. The sample consisted of two classes, namely classes and selected by purposive sampling. The instrument used was a mathematical reasoning ability test. Data analysis used t-test (Independent Sample t-Test) and Mann Whitney. The analysis results show that: (1) based on the results on a limited, medium, and wide-scale try-out, the developed model is easy-practical-effective in its implementation; (2) the improvement in mathematical reasoning skill of the students taught using the model is higher than that of taught using direct instructions; and (3) Sociohumanistic-based learning has several advantages especially can generate endorphins (hormone of happiness) to make the students love math, can foster self-reliance of learners, able to activate the storage capabilities of the human brain into long-term memory. Based on the results of this research and development, it can be concluded that the developed model is easy, practical, and effective to improve the mathematical reasoning skill of elementary school students.

show abstract

“…Guru hanya menciptakan suasana, menyediakan fasilitas, dan berperan sebagai manajer dalam proses pembelajaran. Siswa mengerjakan matematika dengan kegiatan dan target yang berbeda-beda, sedangkan guru berperan sebagai fasilitator, sumber ajar, dan pemonitor kegiatan siswa (Zaini & Marsigit, 2014). Karena itu, diperlukan suatu pendekatan pembelajaran matematika yang memberikan kesempatan kepada siswa untuk aktif dalam membangun sendiri pengetahuannya dengan menjadikan matematika sebagai aktivitas manusia sehingga dapat menguasai konsep dan meningkatkan kemampuan matematisnya (Sitorus, 2016).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Peningkatan Kemampuan Matematis Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik

Agusta

2020

ALGORITMA Journal of Mathematics Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In general, junior high school students learn mathematics with an inductive pattern. However, the statements in mathematics are obtained through a deductive mindset. Therefore we need a learning approach that can accommodate students' thinking patterns. Mathematics adheres to the law of consistency which causes the structure of material in mathematics to be hierarchically arranged, interrelated, and has characteristics that have implications for determining strategies, approaches and the use of learning media. This article aims to review the theory of the Realistic Mathematics Education Approach (PMR). An approach that can make students involved in building their own concepts and models used through problem solving. The PMR discussion begins with the definition of PMR, the principles and characteristics of PMR, and the contribution of PMR in learning mathematics. Writing this article uses the literature review method which consists of books, journal articles, and other documents related to the topic of discussion. The results of the study found that Realistic Mathematics Education (PMR) is a mathematics learning innovation that is in accordance with the 2013 curriculum.The use of contexts and models, as well as the use of student contributions through discussions to discuss various linkages between mathematics material, makes this approach able to contribute to improving five general mathematical abilities. which includes: the ability to understand mathematics, problem solving, mathematical connections, mathematical communication, and mathematical reasoning.

show abstract

Perbandingan Keefektifan Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik Dan Konvensional Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Penalaran Dan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa

Cited by 20 publications

References 0 publications

Comparison of Mathematical Students of SMP Students Between Learning Using a Realistic Approach With Using Open Ended Approach

Comparison of Mathematical Students of SMP Students Between Learning Using a Realistic Approach With Using Open Ended Approach

Improving elementary students' mathematical reasoning abilities through sociohumanistic-based learning

Peningkatan Kemampuan Matematis Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About