The legality of an agreement needed to provide protection for the parties. The diverting of receivable of title has been made by the parties through the cession agreement. The cession agreement has been diverting more than once, through sales and pruchase agreements. On process of repeated cession, the legality was ambiguity. In Article 1313 Indonesian Civil Code state "An agreement is an act pursuant to which one or more individuals commit themselves to one another". It means that the agreement creates rights and obligations among the parties. Legal protection is needed for the parties. The decree of Supreme Court No. 268 / K / PDT, does not provide protection for the buyer of repeated cession. On Article 28D paragraph 1 ofThe 1945 Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia "Every person shall be entitled to recognition, guaranty, protection, and equitable legal certainty as well as equal treatment before the law". This study aims to determine of legal protection for the buyer on repeated cession also for to find out the legality of repeated cession. This research uses a normative judicial method. This research aims to discover the legality and legal protection for the buyer of repeated cession. This research concludes that the repeated cession are legal, and legal protection for buyer are provide by the law. The decree of supreme court has deviation the agremeents/ law.