2009
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.154906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetration of topical and subconjunctival corticosteroids into human aqueous humour and its therapeutic significance

Abstract: Topical and subconjunctival corticosteroids are some of the most effective and compelling treatment options in ocular inflammatory diseases. A systematic review of literature indexed by Ovid MEDLINE & EMBASE was performed up to December 2008. There are few studies on their aqueous penetration in human subjects. This review article discusses the penetration of different ocular corticosteroids into human aqueous humour along with the therapeutic implications on management of ocular surface diseases, immune-relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[33][34][35][36] Moreover, the acetate analogue of prednisolone is more hydrophobic; hence, it has a higher tendency to stay attached to the PLC microfilms rather than be released within a short period of time. Therefore, we chose PA as the loading drug in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35][36] Moreover, the acetate analogue of prednisolone is more hydrophobic; hence, it has a higher tendency to stay attached to the PLC microfilms rather than be released within a short period of time. Therefore, we chose PA as the loading drug in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loteprednol, the soft steroid may be preferable to the conventional topical steroids in allergic ocular inflammation as it is rapidly hydrolyzed to its inactive metabolites in the corneal and intraocular tissues and hence free from various steroid related ocular complications. 4,[16][17][18][19] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, somewhat higher mapracorat concentrations in aqueous humor were observed at doses Ͼ50 g/eye, suggesting that distribution of mapracorat into aqueous humor may be partly limited by preferential distribution into surrounding tissues with a finite capacity that is saturated at doses greater than 50 g/eye. Drug levels in aqueous humor are occasionally used for topical ophthalmic therapeutic agents as a surrogate marker for ocular penetration and/or pharmacologic efficacy (McCulley et al, 2006;Awan et al, 2009). However, the present investigation illustrates an exception to this practice, because aqueous humor levels of mapracorat accurately reflect neither the pharmacokinetics in the surrounding tissue nor apparently its pharmacodynamic effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%