1968
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1968.23.2.471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer-, Self-, and Test-Ratings of Creativity

Abstract: Peer-, self-, and test-ratings of creativity were obtained from 17 physically disabled Ss. The tests were preferences for polygons varying in complexity-simplicity, and a true-false, 30-item, paper-and-pencil personality measure of creativity. Spearman rank order correlations showed that peer ratings were significantly correlated with all the other three creativity measures, and self ratings were also significantly correlated with polygon preference. There was no significant relationship between the two creati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Challenges derived from the self‐ and other‐rated creativity assessment gap have been recognized for several decades in traditional work settings (Eisenman & Robinson, 1968). However, the explanatory mechanisms and boundary conditions that may reliably translate self‐rated creativity into other‐rated creativity remain unclear (Miron‐Spektor & Beenen, 2015; Zhou et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges derived from the self‐ and other‐rated creativity assessment gap have been recognized for several decades in traditional work settings (Eisenman & Robinson, 1968). However, the explanatory mechanisms and boundary conditions that may reliably translate self‐rated creativity into other‐rated creativity remain unclear (Miron‐Spektor & Beenen, 2015; Zhou et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%